Steve, if you haven't already, could you one day address the Annihilationist interpretations of passages like Rev. 20:10; 14:11; 21:8? Your knowledge of hermeneutics and exegesis would be very useful in possibly refuting their involved and complicated interpretations which have the appearance of plausibility. Obviously their published works are more carefully crafted than what's spoken in a debate. So, maybe one day you'll have an in-depth critique in addition to any possible preliminary ones. Even if they successfully undermine the Traditionalist interpretations of those passages, Traditionalism might still be true (which I strongly suspect). But if their interpretations of those key passages were refuted, it would go a LONG WAY in establishing ECT.
Did you watch the Chris Date debate?
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/fWzYTGRbR60
I only date women! :-)
DeleteI've seen a fair amount of Date's stuff. Unimpressed.
DeleteHe can win debates because he's a single issue guy. It's like debating a 9/11 Truther.
Steve, if you haven't already, could you one day address the Annihilationist interpretations of passages like Rev. 20:10; 14:11; 21:8? Your knowledge of hermeneutics and exegesis would be very useful in possibly refuting their involved and complicated interpretations which have the appearance of plausibility. Obviously their published works are more carefully crafted than what's spoken in a debate. So, maybe one day you'll have an in-depth critique in addition to any possible preliminary ones. Even if they successfully undermine the Traditionalist interpretations of those passages, Traditionalism might still be true (which I strongly suspect). But if their interpretations of those key passages were refuted, it would go a LONG WAY in establishing ECT.
DeleteMy friend is doing a seriesthat might interest you:
ReplyDeletehttp://freedthinkerpodcast.blogspot.com/2018/06/seriously-wth-part-1.html?m=1