Friday, October 20, 2017

On dogs, strangers, and atheism

Atheists often say that while human life has no ultimate meaning, our lives can be meaningful based on what we personally value. In a sense that's true–because the criterion is circular: it's valuable because I value it.

Dennis Prager often cites surveys in which some pet owners say they'd save their dog rather than a stranger. That illustrates the distinction between subjective and objective value. In that respect, it makes sense for an atheist to say his life is still meaningful. But by the same token, that evinces the nihilism of atheism. The choice between saving your dog or saving a child from a burning building. From a secular standpoint, there's no reason an atheist should prioritize the child over his pet dog. But so much the worse for atheism. 

1 comment:

  1. 2017 Templeton Prize Ceremony for Dr. Alvin Plantinga
    https://youtu.be/uOjJ0E_LPcA


    Sh. Hamza Yusuf's address at Templeton Prize Ceremony 2017 [worth listening to]
    https://youtu.be/qk5xsjb63E4

    ReplyDelete