I left this comment there:There is no need for "misinterpretation" -- Roman scholars have ways of re-shaping what their doctrines say:“Essential to a critical interpretation of church documents is the realization that the Roman Catholic Church does not change her official stance in a blunt way. Past statements are not rejected but are requoted with praise and then reinterpreted at the same time” (Raymond E. Brown, “The Critical Meaning of the Bible,” New York, NY: Paulist Press ©1981, Nihil Obstat and Imprimitur, pg 18 fn 41).http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/05/question-of-truth-lies-at-centre-of_31.html
I left this comment there:
ReplyDeleteThere is no need for "misinterpretation" -- Roman scholars have ways of re-shaping what their doctrines say:
“Essential to a critical interpretation of church documents is the realization that the Roman Catholic Church does not change her official stance in a blunt way. Past statements are not rejected but are requoted with praise and then reinterpreted at the same time” (Raymond E. Brown, “The Critical Meaning of the Bible,” New York, NY: Paulist Press ©1981, Nihil Obstat and Imprimitur, pg 18 fn 41).
http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2011/05/question-of-truth-lies-at-centre-of_31.html