Monday, November 27, 2006
Hyper-Preterism
Since I've used a preterist hermeneutic to answer the likes of exapologist and interlocutor, I thought I would point out that I believe that there are serious errors with hyper-preterism (the eschatological school). I've written a critique of hyper-preterism, and so wanted to hi-light the fact that I reject it, and I reject it as heresy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
and "sniz," "yawn," "scratch," "sniff" and all that good stuff.
ReplyDeletePaul says:
ReplyDeleteand "sniz," "yawn," "scratch," "sniff" and all that good stuff.
Proof that Paul is the one making all the yawn comments as well!1!1!!!
:P
Right. Tell that to Ted.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, maybe you're me since you typoed your exclamation points. You know how bad my spelling, gammar, and punctuation is, right?
So, your post is proof that you're me!!11!!11!!
And since I'm a moron and an idiot, guess what that makes you?
:-D
wow, great stuff!
ReplyDeleteNooooo! You discovered my cunning plan, which was as cunning as a fox what used to be professor of cunning at Oxford University, but has moved on, and is now working for the UN at the high commission of international cunning planning.
ReplyDeleteYou should sell this article, Paul. You could become a "billionair!"
ReplyDelete:::WWHHHHIIIIZZZZZ!!!!:::
ReplyDeleteIf hyper-preterism is heresy, is partial preterism just a little bit of heresy? Kind of like coke-lite?
ReplyDeletehmmm.
Paul, call your mom. I think you got a little problem here.
hyper-preterism is an eschatalogical school.
ReplyDeletePreterism is simply a hermeneutical method.
My mom's a partial preterist :-D
I just watched "The DaVinci Code" last night, and it PROVES that the Bible was made up, and voted upon, by hordes of differing sects with different agendas.
ReplyDeleteThis PROVES that these silly preterism discussions are meaningless, because the bible you're arguing from is simply a book put together by men's votes.
I just watched the Passion of The Christ and it PROVES that Jesus was real anf that he rose again.
ReplyDeleteThis PROVES your silly atheist discussions are meaningless because I watched a MOVIE telling me different.
LOL
Next thing you know, ripple_effect will think America has the Arc of the Covenant hid away because he watched Indina Jones and that PROVES that America has the Arc.
I just read a blog and feel dirty. This one.
ReplyDeletePaul Manata - what is this "Indina Jones" movie you're talking about? Sounds interesting!
ReplyDeleteI see you can't deal with the truth of the Da Vinci code, but can only resort to weak assertions about that racist Mel Gibson's movie. Are you a racist like Mel?
I see you can't deal with the truth of the Indiana Jones movie, but need to resort to the Gnostic Brown. Are you a Gnostic?
ReplyDelete(btw, if you're too dense: if you can use a fiction movie to refute me I'll use one to refute you. Glad to know that atheists have now had to resort to appealing to fiction books and movies to beat Christians. And that's because you have a fairy-tale universe worldview. One where frogs turn into princes.)
Paul Manata - I point the finger of truth at YOU!!!!
ReplyDeleteI am not an atheist, what are you talking about? I have never claimed to be one?
The DaVinci code lays out how at the Council of Nicea, men voted on the Bible! That is crazy! Your Christianity is based on men's votes! The divine feminine spirit of the universe has been attempted to be squelched by men ever since!
Paul, how could you write anything about hyperpreterism and not shoot me an email?
ReplyDelete