Typically progressives don't have a problem with pornography or masturbation. In fact, typically they encourage watching porn and masturbating.
Hence when men struggling with these encourage one another to abstain from watching porn and masturbation (e.g. No Nut November, NoFap), progressives are triggered. Others may be triggered as well, but progressives especially.
One argument progressives bring up is that if men don't watch porn and masturbate, then they'll have an increased risk of prostate cancer:
- At the risk of stating the obvious, porn and masturbation are separable. One could masturbate without watching porn.
- However, even on progressive terms, it's not really about masturbation but ejaculation. A man can be happily married and engaging in regular sex with his wife. He should be routinely ejaculating in a marriage with regular sex.
- By contrast, one big reason men encourage one another to abstain from watching porn and masturbating is because these men realize it's causing them to lose control over their lives. They've become losers. Coomers. So these struggling guys want to turn away from watching porn and masturbating. They want to regain control over their lives. They want to seek a real woman with whom to have a relationship with and hopefully marry. Are progressives against men seeking long-term romantic relationships with women? Are progressives against couples getting married?
- As far as the medical science behind the idea that frequent masturbation lowers the risk for prostate cancer, see UpToDate:
An association between ejaculatory frequency and a lower risk of prostate cancer has been suggested in two case-control studies:
- In a study which compared men under the age of 70 who had prostate cancer with age-matched controls, men who had five or more ejaculations per week while in their 20s (but not their 30s or 40s) had a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer (odds ratio 0.66) than those who had fewer ejaculations [148].
- A report from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study compared men who developed prostate cancer (n = 3839) with controls of a similar age group who had similar ejaculatory frequency but no prostate cancer [149]. On multivariable analysis, the incidence of prostate cancer was significantly reduced for men having more than 21 ejaculations per month compared with those with 4 to 7 ejaculations per month between ages 20 and 29 years (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.92). The HR for those reporting more than 21 versus 4 to 7 ejaculations per month between ages 40 and 49 years was 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.89).
The validity of this relationship has been called into question because of the lack of association of prostate cancer with ejaculation frequency in older men and the fact that other studies have failed to show a protective effect from being married or having more sexual partners [150]. Moreover, the problem of recall bias also casts doubt on the interpretation of studies that use this methodology.
Off topic but this seems to be a case of a typical catholic convert from Protestantism. He's convinced that the catholic church has never compromised. The pope has met with Fr. Martin and apparently no biggie. Catholic Universities give out contraception and have LGBT groups but it's the benighted protestants who are compromising.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.catholic.com/profile/don-johnson
That's interesting! Thanks for bringing that to my attention, Steve Jackson!
DeleteTransgenderism is cancerous. Men can get cervical cancer while women can get prostate cancer.
ReplyDeleteGood point! :)
Delete