No. It is not testable, it is not falsifiable. If offers shoehorn's some 'alternative power' into explanations that do not need it. The ability of intelligent design proponents to obsfucate should be a clue for anyone who thinks it is a viable scientific theory. Back a few years ago it was demonstrated that ID is nothing more than Creationism with specific references to a Diety deliberately hidden. The only thing intelligently deigned about ID are it's psuedo-scientific arguments.
Your multiplied assertions don't add up to a single argument. And you offered no counterargument to Meyer's article. But as long as you "feel" justified, I guess that's good enough for you.
No. It is not testable, it is not falsifiable. If offers shoehorn's some 'alternative power' into explanations that do not need it. The ability of intelligent design proponents to obsfucate should be a clue for anyone who thinks it is a viable scientific theory. Back a few years ago it was demonstrated that ID is nothing more than Creationism with specific references to a Diety deliberately hidden. The only thing intelligently deigned about ID are it's psuedo-scientific arguments.
ReplyDeleteYour multiplied assertions don't add up to a single argument. And you offered no counterargument to Meyer's article. But as long as you "feel" justified, I guess that's good enough for you.
Delete