Steve, slightly related (in that it refers to liberal textual crit) but not that much, I wonder if you or anyone on the Triablogue team had any thoughts on this apparently mythicist review of Bauckham's "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses"?
http://tektonics.org/ addresses some of Doherty's arguments. One can use the Google search that's already there on the website to get many hits on "Doherty".
Didn't read the link. Mythers typically aren't worth the time of day. But if AP mentions Doherty I assume much of this guy's case is the Paul didn't know Jesus line. To that end, Miller has a good amount of relevant material on the Christian think-tank:
Steve, slightly related (in that it refers to liberal textual crit) but not that much, I wonder if you or anyone on the Triablogue team had any thoughts on this apparently mythicist review of Bauckham's "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses"?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AS6K4YBP61R2J/ref=cm_pdp_rev_title_1?ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview#R2N5DWHTC819GP
http://tektonics.org/ addresses some of Doherty's arguments. One can use the Google search that's already there on the website to get many hits on "Doherty".
DeleteHere's a link to my link to J.P. Holding's Review and Critique of "The Case Against The Case For Christ" by Robert M. Price
DeleteDidn't read the link. Mythers typically aren't worth the time of day. But if AP mentions Doherty I assume much of this guy's case is the Paul didn't know Jesus line. To that end, Miller has a good amount of relevant material on the Christian think-tank:
ReplyDeletehttp://christianthinktank.com/muddleplatonismx1.html