Da champ (aka Matthew “the Baby-Faced Ax-killer” Bellisario) wants to be a criminologist when he grows up. He even has a blog devoted to criminology. Gil Grissom move over.
His blogroll includes a number of links to criminology websites, criminal justice websites, and criminal justice blogs.
There are, however, some striking omissions. For example, I don’t see the website for snapnetwork.org (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests), or the website for BishopAccountability.com, or the website for Voice of the Faithful (www.votf.org/).
Given da champ’s professional interest in crime and punishment, as well as his zeal for the one true church, I assume these omissions are purely inadvertent and his part. I’m sure we can expect him to add these websites to his blogroll now that this oversight has been brought to his attention.
You are really a sick individual. Get some professional help. You are really embarrassing yourself.
ReplyDeleteMATTHEW BELLISARIO SAID:
ReplyDelete"You are really a sick individual. Get some professional help. You are really embarrassing yourself."
I see. It's not individuals like Cardinal Law, Paul Shanley, or John Geoghan who are sick. No, it's those who shine a spotlight on their conduct that are sick.
Thanks for reminding us, once again, of what it takes to be a pious Catholic.
Have you ever heard of using real arguments? Or are personal attacks all that you have in your bag of tricks? I mean resorting to "aka Matthew “the Baby-Faced Ax-killer”? That makes you feel better, rather than admitting you made a bad analogy? Rather than correct your mistake you resort to this nonsense? I think we all know who has the real problem here. As i said before, when you are ready to debate a topic with serious rational arguments, you know where you can find me. I would suggest stopping this nonsense. No one is going to take you seriously with garbage like this.
ReplyDeleteMATTHEW BELLISARIO SAID:
ReplyDelete“Have you ever heard of using real arguments?”
Real arguments are certainly in short supply at “The Catholic Champion” blog, if that’s what you mean. Would you like some help in learning how to construct a real argument?
“Or are personal attacks all that you have in your bag of tricks? I mean resorting to ‘aka Matthew “the Baby-Faced Ax-killer’?”
You style yourself the “champion.” Well, champions frequently have nicknames, like Chuck “the Iceman” Liddell.
“That makes you feel better, rather than admitting you made a bad analogy?”
I quoted a Catholic apologist who used social, biological, and zoological analogies to prove the papacy. I then responded to him on his own terms. Sorry if you lack the intellectual equipment to follow the argument.
And calling something a bad analogy doesn’t make it so. You’re a person who likes to use the word “argument” a lot without actually arguing your point.
“Rather than correct your mistake you resort to this nonsense?”
Actually, I presented counterarguments to your allegations–counterarguments which, I notice, you conveniently ignore.
“I think we all know who has the real problem here.”
I appreciate your confession. Admitting that you have a problem is the first step. Now how do you plan to deal with your problem, Matthew?
“As i said before, when you are ready to debate a topic with serious rational arguments, you know where you can find me.”
In your bedroom, crying into your pillow.
“I would suggest stopping this nonsense.”
So who’s stopping you?
“No one is going to take you seriously with garbage like this.”
If you don’t us seriously, then when do you keep commenting on what we say? For someone who doesn’t take us seriously, you do a wonderful impersonation of someone who takes us seriously.
"'As i said before, when you are ready to debate a topic with serious rational arguments, you know where you can find me.'
ReplyDeleteIn your bedroom, crying into your pillow."
Golden. Laughed out loud.
Matthew just looooooves his double standards...mmmm, they're so tasty!
ReplyDelete