Guest for next week's The Narrow Mind (Oct. 30-Nov. 3) are as follows:
Monday - R. Scott Clark "Covenant, Justification and Pastoral Ministry"
Tuesday - James Kime "New Covenant Theology and Israel"
Wednesday - Christopher Hallquist "Christianity and Atheism"
Thursday - Jason Robertson and Scott Hill "Covenant Theology"
Friday - Jay Walker "His Return to The Narrow Mind"
The Narrow Mind airs live online at Unchained Radio, Mon. - Frid., 9-10am PDT. Phone lines are usually open after the first half hour. To get on board call 1-800-466-1873.
The program's podcast is located here and discussion on each show takes place here.
Ha! They're going to have Christopher Hallquist on the show? I'd like to see that. He's not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed. I responded to him here and here regarding his critique of Dr. Craig's book.
ReplyDeleteMy tool shed had one irony meter, and you just broke it.
ReplyDelete:::YAWN!!!:::
ReplyDeleteHahah! Jay Walker. My favourite atheist intellectual.
ReplyDeletebtw, you might happen to find this a bit interesting.
ReplyDeletehttp://consolatione.blogspot.com/2006/10/brian-sapient-runs-from-debate.html
Jim,
ReplyDeleteWill Bert Runberklerstein be calling in again? I heard you knew him. ;-)
Heh - he may return. I'm sure he's been busy admiring his newly grown, God-given hair and his new shapely body (women like him now, contrary to what Jay Walker said). The miracles that we see, I'll tell ya.
ReplyDeleteBert is back?????
ReplyDeleteThat was toooooo crazy,
I never laughed like I did, compared to the discomfiter,
That was out of control
I was curious. Does the Bible have to be inerrant for TAG and presuppositionalism to work? And related to this question: My ESV or NIV or whatever is not inerrant. Neither is my Greek Nestle/Aland Greek text or my Hebrew Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia text. How does this affect the TAGers argument?
ReplyDeleteanon,
ReplyDeleteSo far as I can tell, the TAG has little to do with inerrancy. Ralph Walker wrote a pretty solid formulation of the transcendental argument against physicalism in Objections to Physicalism, Robinson 1993, pp. 61-80.
You could use the TAG, for example, and be a Deist or Muslim or etc., so far as I can tell. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Furthermore, PS is an apologetic method that is 99.9% Christian, but I see no reason that Muslims and other worldviews couldn't advocate it as well -- claim that their own worldview "accounts for" everything, and nothing else does, and that by impossibility of the contrary, their own worldview is true, etc., etc.
I suppose PS doesn't even have to be a religious method. It could just be a general defense of any worldview/philosophical system, I would think.
Of course, I think it's a poor method, but nonetheless...
Dan Morgan. You are wrong. Read earlier responses to John Johnson's articles.
ReplyDeleteI presume the show with the Discomfiter is NOT the rerun of his previous appearance? If so, then John W. Loftus ought to call-in on the show too and help his number one disciple. Booyeah!
ReplyDeleteFrank, this is not a rerun. Jay Walker made a appearance on Friday's edition of The Narrow Mind. He supposedly has some new arguments...perhaps better than the "funk in my shoe" one, which btw has be taken care of.
ReplyDeleteJeff,
ReplyDeleteCare to provide a link, or a summary?