Good to see a review like this. There seems to be a dearth of systematic reviews let alone meta-analyses (if that's even possible to do here) on various paranormal subjects (e.g. NDEs, ESP, ghosts/apparitions).
Granted, it's difficult for a single person or perhaps even a single group of researchers to do a systematic review on a huge topic like NDEs or ESP. However, one can still research and write a systematic review on subtopics like precognition, retrocognition, clairvoyance/clairaudience, telepathy, psychokinesis, etc.
Good to see a review like this. There seems to be a dearth of systematic reviews let alone meta-analyses (if that's even possible to do here) on various paranormal subjects (e.g. NDEs, ESP, ghosts/apparitions).
ReplyDeleteGranted, it's difficult for a single person or perhaps even a single group of researchers to do a systematic review on a huge topic like NDEs or ESP. However, one can still research and write a systematic review on subtopics like precognition, retrocognition, clairvoyance/clairaudience, telepathy, psychokinesis, etc.