He did that last month (March 24). I did two posts on the same subject this month (4/18 & 4/19):
There's so much conceptual overlap between his presentation and my two posts. We both quote from the two Wallace papers. We use very similar arguments.
A redaction critic would assume some literary interdependence. I redacted him or he redacted me.
But he didn't have access to my posts since his presentation was given 3 weeks before, while I didn't have access to his presentation, which was only uploaded onto the internet today (at least, that's when I first saw it). And I only had access to the Wallace papers as of 4/17.
What are the odds that my posts are independent of his presentation, and vice versa? What are the odds the we're both quoting from Wallace's two articles, less than a month apart? Just coincidental? How to account for the parallels.
Yet, as a matter of fact, the timing actually precludes comparing notes. That illustrates the pitfalls of redaction criticism.
Very interesting.
ReplyDeleteYou are both friends with me. I am Q!
ReplyDeleteWith Wallacean priority.
Delete