If you take any book or article by Richard Carrier and just investigate the footnotes, you can see very early on that the ethical infractions are eventually going to surface in this guy's life.
A summary of the claims against him:http://the-orbit.net/almostdiamonds/2016/06/20/summarizing-current-allegations-richard-carrier/
He fancied himself an ethical polyamorist but that didn't go down well among SJWs attracted to atheism.Savour the schadenfreude.
Unless they can justify objective morality atheists shouldn't judge Richard Carrier since he self identifies as being "no less a philosopher than Aristotle", and apparently no less a philanderer than Don Juan.
Until atheists do, they have no basis to condemn Richard Carrier for believing his dream world to actually be real. Given atheism, self-delusion is not impermissible.
Given sex is what he really lives for, Richard Carrier should've considered becoming the leader of a sex cult instead.Then again, Carrier isn't very charismatic or commanding so he might not have been able to make it.
"Richard Carrier’s posting privileges [at Freethoughtblogs] have been suspended, pending further evaluation, and all comments on his blog have been closed."http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/21/richard-carriers-blog/