Dr.
Hector Avalos6/02/2013 3:05 AM
My statement refers to my inability to verify your claim with my five senses and/or logic, which are the instruments I normally use in my every day life to verify the reality of claims.I am assuming that Steve, you, and I agree that our five senses and/or logic can give reliable data.
Hector’s appeal to logic raises a troublesome question. From
a secular standpoint, what does Avalos suppose logic is? How does he ground
logic? What’s his ontology of logic?
Does he regard logic as just a systematic description of how
our finite, contingent, timebound simian brains happen to think? If so, how
does he distinguish a logical brain from an illogical brain? Two different
brains can arrive at opposite conclusions. If logic mirrors the brain, what
adjudicates one brain from another?
What about a brain that’s high on LSD? Is that a reliable
brain? He can’t very well say a brain that’s high on LSD is malfunctioning, for
natural selection is not a goal-oriented process. Methodological naturalism
banishes teleological explanations from natural science.
No comments:
Post a Comment