Or if I were more interested in driveby commenting than attempting to make comments of substance a la Ben Schuldt, I could simply say: No matter who loses, Jesus wins!
I didn't know anyone including Christians claimed Jesus "be magic," yo! Someone might claim Jesus practiced magic. Or that Jesus isn't any more real than magic. But not that Jesus is (or isn't) magic. That's a novel claim!
No matter who wins, Jesus loses!
ReplyDeleteI love the smell of atheists bashing each other in the morning!
ReplyDeleteBen Schuldt said:
ReplyDelete"No matter who wins, Jesus loses!"
Hm, I guess this is how "Jesus loses":
If Ehrman wins, then all the worse for village atheists like Carrier.
If Carrier wins, then all the worse for atheism as a whole since village atheists like Carrier are increasingly speaking for atheism.
And Jesus still won't be magic in any event.
ReplyDeleteI think what RWH is saying is, no matter who wins, atheism loses. Jesus will be just fine.
ReplyDeleteTime to see how many of the Cult of Gnu tie their necks to Carrier's anchor.
Thanks, Crude!
ReplyDeleteOr if I were more interested in driveby commenting than attempting to make comments of substance a la Ben Schuldt, I could simply say: No matter who loses, Jesus wins!
Ben Schuldt said:
ReplyDelete"And Jesus still won't be magic in any event."
I didn't know anyone including Christians claimed Jesus "be magic," yo! Someone might claim Jesus practiced magic. Or that Jesus isn't any more real than magic. But not that Jesus is (or isn't) magic. That's a novel claim!
Wake me when the CarriEhrman spat approaches the level of the Dick Dawk vs enlightened feminists catfight.
ReplyDeletelulz, there's nuclear and then there's *nuclear*.
ReplyDelete