I don't know whether he'd classify himself as an evidentialist. Since he's a former student of Gary Habermas, and has been closely associated with him since then (they wrote a book together, for example), he may consider himself an evidentialist with the same sort of qualifications Habermas has laid out.
Don't know Licona at all. So, from your other post, I gather he's an evidentialist?
ReplyDeleteDJP,
ReplyDeleteI don't know whether he'd classify himself as an evidentialist. Since he's a former student of Gary Habermas, and has been closely associated with him since then (they wrote a book together, for example), he may consider himself an evidentialist with the same sort of qualifications Habermas has laid out.
Thanks.
ReplyDelete