It is not like you (and other evangelical scholars) haven't already covered much of this ground before, and it is easy to see his own "protective strategy" and "privileging" as he defines the “critical” method as assuming "methodological naturalism" a priori (p.22). Yet, you always seem to be able to find the fallacies better than anyone. Thanks!
Steve,
ReplyDeleteWould you mind commenting on this article?:
https://www.academia.edu/10039504/_Protective_Strategies_and_the_Prestige_of_the_Academic_A_Religious_Studies_and_Practice_Theory_Redescription_of_Evangelical_Inerrantist_Scholarship
It is starting to make the rounds:
http://cruxsolablog.com/2015/03/13/stephen-young-on-inerrantist-protective-strategies-skinner/
It is not like you (and other evangelical scholars) haven't already covered much of this ground before, and it is easy to see his own "protective strategy" and "privileging" as he defines the “critical” method as assuming "methodological naturalism" a priori (p.22). Yet, you always seem to be able to find the fallacies better than anyone. Thanks!
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/andrew-bolt-sbs-takes-a-controversial-stance-on-family-values/story-fnj45fva-1227268572344
ReplyDelete