Saturday, November 08, 2014

Marian prayers


Lydia McGrew said...
A couple of illustrations. Here are a couple of very ancient prayers to the Virgin Mary:

We fly to thy patronage,
O holy Mother of God;
despise not our petitions in our necessities,
but deliver us always from all dangers,
O glorious and blessed Virgin. Amen.
3rd Century; Oldest Known Prayer to Mary

Loving Mother of the Redeemer,
Gate of heaven, star of the sea,
Assist your people
who have fallen yet strive to rise again,
To the wonderment of nature you bore your Creator,
yet remained a virgin after as before,
You who received Gabriel's joyful greeting,
have pity on us, poor sinners.
Ancient Liturgy of the Hours Prayer\

Many, many more examples could be found. One would _never_ speak of asking for the prayers of a friend on earth, however godly, in those terms.

Imagine that Jones is a very godly man and that Smith is his less godly Christian friend. Smith has some problems in his life. One would never say to Smith, "Fly to Jones for refuge and ask him to deliver you from all dangers" meaning by that, "Ask Jones to pray for you." It wouldn't matter how great a person Jones was, how great a Christian, how much the passage in James could be presumed to apply to Jones. To talk about Jones in those terms would be to treat him as a superbeing or a magician, not just an especially godly man.

And all the more so if you were telling the person to do this by mental prayer, which God would convey to Jones in the form of some sort of supernaturally aided ESP.

If one asserts that the saints' knowledge of our prayers is made possible by divine miracle rather than being due to a natural power, but if all liturgical practice encourages people to *take it as a given* that they can speak from anywhere on earth to Mary or the other saints and be heard, then the term "miracle" is irrelevant to the impression given. This is a "miracle" that is always done by God and can be taken for granted in practice to be in force--they will hear your prayers. The effect of all of this is, unfortunately, very much what I felt bound to assert in the main post. I speak here as someone who once was more sympathetic to prayers for the saints.

IMO it would be better for Catholic apologists to bite the bullet. Instead of telling Protestants that it's just like asking a godly friend for prayers, which feels like a bait and switch in light of actual Catholic practice (not just of ignorant Catholics, but uniform and church-endorsed Catholic practice), it would be better just to say outright: There is an admittedly thin but bright line in Catholic theology between what we do w.r.t. the saints and worship. You Protestants should just get over your squeamishness over the thinness of that line, rely on its brightness, and cross the Tiber.

11 comments:

  1. https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6590312557191237519&postID=3728487775119205376
    This is on David's "Answering Muslims" blog. I got involved, and I wanted to see what you thought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's the date/title of the thread?

      Delete
    2. http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2014/11/william-lane-craig-how-muslim-concept.html

      "William Lane Craig: How the Muslim Concept of God Fails"

      Delete
  2. it would be better just to say outright: There is an admittedly thin but bright line in Catholic theology between what we do w.r.t. the saints and worship.

    What does "w.r.t." stand for / mean?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Replies
    1. oh; thanks. I would have never figured that out. I see more and more abbreviations these days like this, that are normal words (not technical), that people are using. Is there some kind of new "ettiquite" going on for this kind of thing? (maybe in texting parlance, ?)

      Delete
    2. If I had to guess, texting and Twitter primarily (where space is at a premium), as well as Internet discussion (forums, YouTube comments, Reddit). These are common abbreviations if you're familiar with those mediums.

      Delete
  4. I appreciate Lydia McGrew's honesty.

    ReplyDelete

  5. Many, many more examples could be found. One would _never_ speak of asking for the prayers of a friend on earth, however godly, in those terms.


    And despite over 150 prayers in Scripture , the Holy Spirit provides exactly ZERO addressed to anyone in Heaven but the Lord (except by pagans). In fact, that Christ is prayed to (Acts 7:59; 1Cor. 1:2) is an attribute to His deity, and to attribute the ability to hear virtually infinite amounts of mental incessant prayers is to ascribe an attribute only God is shown able to have.

    Note that many Catholic Marian attributions much parallel even that of Christ:

    For in the the Catholic quest to almost deify Mary, it is taught by Catholics*,

    as Christ was sinless, so Mary was;

    as the Lord remained a virgin, so Mary;

    as Christ was called the Son of God, indicating ontological oneness, so Mary is called the Mother of God (which easily infers the same, and is not the language of Scripture);

    as the emphasis is upon Christ as the Creator through whom God (the Father) made all things, including Mary, so it is emphasized that uniquely “to her, Jesus owes His Precious Blood,” shed for the salvation of mankind, (the logic behind which can lead back to Eve);

    as Catholics (adding error to error) believe Christ gave His actual flesh and blood to be eaten, so it is emphasized that Mary gave Him this, being fashioned out of Mary's pure blood and even being “kneaded with the admixture of her virginal milk,” so that she can say, "Come and eat my bread, drink the wine I have prepared" (Prov. 9:5);

    as Scripture declares that Christ suffered for our sins, so Mary is said to have done so also;

    as Christ saves us from the condemnation and death resulting from the fault of Adam, so it is taught that man was condemned through the fault of Eve, the root of death, but that we are saved through the merits of Mary; who was the source of life for everyone.

    as the Lord was bodily ascended into Heaven, so Mary also was;

    as Christ is given all power in heaven and in earth, so Mary is “surpassing in power all the angels and saints in Heaven.”

    as Christ is the King of the saints and over all kings, (Rv. 15:3; 17:14; 19:16) so Mary is made Queen of Heaven and the greatest saint, and that “Next to God, she deserves the highest praise;”

    as the Father made Christ Lord over all things, so Mary is enthroned (all other believers have to wait for their crowns) and exalted by the Lord as Queen over all things;

    as Christ is highly exalted above all under the Father, so Mary is declared to be the greatest saint of all, and as having a certain equality with the Heavenly Father;

    as Christ ever liveth to make intercession for the saints, so is Mary said to do so;

    as all things come from the Father through the Son, so Mary is made to be the dispenser of all grace;

    as Christ is given all power on Heaven and on earth, Mary is said to have (showing some restraint) “almost unlimited power;”

    as no man comes to the Father but through the Son, so it is taught that no one can come to the Son except through Mary in Heaven;

    and as the Lord called souls to come to Him to be given life and salvation, so (in misappropriation of the words of Scripture) it is said of Mary, “He that shall find me shall find life, and shall have salvation from the Lord;” “that through her are obtained every hope, every grace, and all salvation. For this is His will, that we obtain everything through Mary.”

    And as Christ is given many titles of honor, so Mary also is, except that she is honored by Catholics with more titles than they give to the Lord Himself!

    More .

    ReplyDelete
  6. And as i have said before, one would have a hard time in Bible times explaining kneeling before a statue and praising the entity it represented in the unseen world, and as having Divine powers and glory, and making offerings and beseeching such for Heavenly help, directly accessed by mental prayer.

    Moses, put down those rocks! I was only engaging in hyper dulia, not adoring her. Can't you tell the difference?

    Image .

    ReplyDelete