Puffing Newman

I'm curious as to why Ref21 would publish this hagiographic review of a biography on Cardinal Newman:

http://www.reformation21.org/articles/john-henry-newman-a-biography.php

I'm not saying Newman doesn't merit biographies. And I'm not saying Newman doesn't have some useful things to say. But the review is utterly one-sided. 

Let's not forget that Newman largely squandered his great gifts in defense of an unworthy cause. 

There's a place for Newman scholarship, but it needs to be discerning. To take a comparison:

http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548132.001.0001/acprof-9780199548132

http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/catholic_historical_review/v097/97.2.strange.html