In his recent book on UFOs, Lue Elizondo wrote about some experiences he and others around him had with orbs:
I never had any interaction with orbs until I started working with the program [a Pentagon investigation of UFOs].
I was shocked to find that a lot of my colleagues and I began experiencing firsthand some of these orbs at our homes. In fact, my wife was a complete skeptic on all this—that is, until she saw an orb in our house for herself.
We had a long main hallway in the house, and one evening a green, glowing ball, probably about the size of a basketball, with soft edges that weren’t defined, floated down slowly from the kitchen to our bedroom door just below ceiling height, then disappeared into a wall. Hoping Jenn caught a glimpse of it, I turned to her, catching the perplexed look on her face. She indeed saw it the entire ten seconds it was in our house.
Another time, the kids reported seeing an orb appear in the air, hover near them for a few seconds, and then float away. They described what they’d seen as best they could, first to my wife, and again to me when I asked. Their description made my blood run cold. The object had been three-dimensional but still translucent and suffused with an eerie green light. The object behaved as if guided by some intelligence. It parked itself in the air, then drifted off down the hall before disappearing entirely.
What the hell was going on?
Were these things probes sent to scope out my house? Was this some sort of adversarial technology being used to conduct surveillance against my family and me? Or worse, was this all part of the UAP [unidentified anomalous phenomena] issue? Maybe another, more advanced intelligence was looking into me and my colleagues because they knew we were looking into them? Or did it all presage something more sinister?
After the pilot Kenneth Arnold’s famous 1947 UAP sighting, which was a couple of weeks before the Roswell crashes, he and his family allegedly had balls of light in their home....
Over time, more orbs appeared in our home. Not too frequently: a whole month might go by, and then one would arrive. Since “our” orbs manifested as clear or green, I did not feel compelled to warn my family to avoid them. I didn’t want to frighten them further. As far as I knew, only blue was problematic.
Nevertheless, we couldn’t shake the things. I’d be sitting at the dining room table, working at my computer or catching up on some reading, and I’d suddenly notice one of these damn balls hovering nearby. Other times, we’d be outside, grilling or hanging out near our koi pond with neighbors, when an orb would appear randomly, linger for a few moments, then mosey over toward the trees on the edges of our property. Our neighbors witnessed this too. It got to the point where neighbors would sometimes joke, “Is this one of our government’s secret programs you are working on, Lue?” Laughing uncomfortably, I’d think to myself, You have no idea how close to the truth you are.
Like the rest of the family, I had tried to ignore the visitations, hoping that they would stop. But they didn’t. During times of high atmospheric energy, such as storms, the occurrences became more pronounced. There are people who would conclude this was somehow connected to lightning, but it wasn’t. Nor were there any high-voltage power lines anywhere in the vicinity.
(Imminent [New York, New York: William Morrow, 2024], approximate Kindle locations 1321, 1351)
Elizondo is a credible witness, and I doubt he'd mention so many other people (coworkers, relatives, neighbors) who saw the same phenomena or type of phenomenon if he was making these things up. He'd be unlikely to open himself up so unnecessarily to so much potential falsification if he were being dishonest.
After reading Elizondo's book, I was reminded of something I'd forgotten about in another book. I was looking something up regarding the Enfield Poltergeist in Stewart Lamont's Is Anybody There? (Great Britain: Mainstream Publishing, 1980). I noticed that, on page 24, there's a brief reference to "a green circular floating light seen by Daily Mirror photographer". At least two Daily Mirror photographers worked the Enfield case, so I wrote to Lamont to find out who he was referring to. He told me he was referring to Graham Morris, but Lamont didn't recall much about the incident. I haven't been successful in my efforts to get more information from Morris.
John Burcombe, one of the foremost witnesses in the Enfield case, described his worst experience during the case as involving a light he saw on the staircase at the Hodgsons' house. Go here and scroll down to the section titled "John Burcombe's Worst Experience" to read more about it. What he describes seems to be an orb, but there's a significant amount of ambiguity.
I've occasionally seen references to orbs of some type in paranormal cases other than the ones discussed above. Alan Gauld and A.D. Cornell referred to haunting cases that involve "the appearance of luminosities and balls of light" (Poltergeists [United States: White Crow Books, 2017], approximate Kindle location 3156). See the Psi Encyclopedia's article here for an overview of orbs in paranormal contexts.
As an illustration of the significance of the parallels involved, think of Elizondo's experiences and the Enfield incident involving Graham Morris. The orbs are the same color, and they're appearing in the same kind of setting, hovering above the ground in a home with current occupants. It would be good to get more information about the Enfield episode (and to what extent there were other such events during the case), to see if there are further parallels with what Elizondo experienced. This kind of event is more expected in a poltergeist case. What stands out more is seeing the same type of event in a UFO-related context. UFOs are associated with larger objects and the outdoors. So, seeing a smaller object appearing indoors is less in character in a UFO setting.
However, there's some significance even in the vaguer parallels among paranormal events involving orbs. All of these incidents, including the ones Gauld and Cornell referred to with less detail, involve orbs consisting of some kind of light and that are seen and whose purpose is unknown (unlike, say, a spherical part of a machine, whose purpose is known). The "seen" qualifier is important. If these orbs were some type of surveillance device, a possibility Elizondo brought up, you'd have to ask why they so often allow themselves to be seen so easily, especially if the beings behind them are as advanced as is often suggested. They seem to hover off the ground the large majority of the time. And my impression is that they're certain colors much more often than others. I don't recall ever hearing of a pink orb in any paranormal context, for example. My main point here, though, is that a common thread among so many paranormal events isn't just the involvement of orbs, but even a particular type of orb (with the characteristics I just outlined). Sometimes the characteristics are more parallel than on other occasions, such as the parallels between Elizondo's experiences and the Enfield incident involving Morris, but even the episodes that are less parallel are significantly similar.
I’ve noticed commonalities between UAP and the paranormal in my reading as well. I plan on listening to Richard Dolan’s “UFOs and the National Security State” over the next few weeks. He thinks UAP phenomenon is the typical nuts and bolts alien explanation. Even in books by guys like him the paranormal gets through.
ReplyDeleteAnd that has a lot of significance. Some of the parallels with things like poltergeists and mediumship, including some of the most important ones, seem to be widely acknowledged among advocates of a lot of different views of UFOs. I suspect the large majority of the public isn't aware of that.
DeleteDo you have a list of 5 books you would recommend on the paranormal etc?
ReplyDeleteA lot depends on factors like where people are in their knowledge of the subject and what their interests are. It's a large field with many subdivisions, and I only have a high level of knowledge of a small portion of it.
DeleteAt the most introductory level, Will Storr published a book titled Will Storr Vs. The Supernatural (New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2006). For those with more knowledge of the issues, but who want something introductory, Stephen Braude's The Gold Leaf Lady (Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 2007) is good. Gregory Shushan's The Next World (United States: White Crow Books, 2022) would be worth reading after Braude's book. Shushan covers a wide variety of issues across a lot of cultures and timeframes, and he discusses a lot of the weaknesses of the phenomena (racism in mediumistic communications, false prophecies in near-death experiences [NDEs], etc.), which frequently get ignored or underestimated in modern coverage of the paranormal.
The best introduction on UFOs that I'm aware of is Leslie Kean's UFOs: Generals, Pilots, And Government Officials Go On The Record (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2010).
On poltergeists, Alan Gauld and A.D. Cornell's Poltergeists (United States: White Crow Books, 2017).
On NDEs, Janice Miner Holden, et al., edd., The Handbook Of Near-Death Experiences (Santa Barbara, California: Praeger Publishers, 2009).
The best information is scattered among a lot of different sources. Gregory Shushan's book on NDEs among people in indigenous religions, Near-Death Experience In Indigenous Religions (New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), is focused on that narrow topic, but there's a section near the end that has some valuable material on a dream model for explaining NDEs. Jacques Vallee's Dimensions (San Antonio, Texas: Anomalist Books, 2008) has a chapter titled "The Case Against Extraterrestrials" that makes some good points about problems with the alien hypothesis for UFOs. And so on. As with other topics, you have to go to many different sources to get many different things.