Check out this article from Richard Dawkins which reviews Stephen Jay Gould's Full House.
Note, for example, Dawkins' conclusion:
...Gould’s attempt to reduce all progress to a trivial, baseball-style artefact constitutes a surprising impoverishment, an uncharacteristic slight, an unwonted demeaning of the richness of evolutionary processes."It's good to catch a behind-the-scenes glimpse of the ferocious dissension over evolutionary theory within the evolutionary community itself.
:::YAWN!!!:::
ReplyDeleteYes, its so shocking that scientists don't agree on everything.