On the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historians would equate "the Christian Era" with "the COmmon Era". If I were a Muslim, I'd be annoyed (well, even more annoyed than usual) about that.
On the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historians would equate the Year of our Lord with "common" era. A Christian should be annoyed (well, even more than usual) about that.
I could do without Wallace's use of "BCE" and "CE."
ReplyDeleteOn the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historians would equate "the Christian Era" with "the COmmon Era". If I were a Muslim, I'd be annoyed (well, even more annoyed than usual) about that.
ReplyDeleteOn the contrary, I'm amazed that secular historians would equate the Year of our Lord with "common" era. A Christian should be annoyed (well, even more than usual) about that.
ReplyDeleteJust curious, is Wallace dispensationalist?
ReplyDeleteFrank Walton said:
ReplyDelete"Just curious, is Wallace dispensationalist?"
I assume so, but this would be a good question for Jonathan Moorehead.
I'm also not quite clear on what dispensationalism stands for nowadays.