Pages

Thursday, March 19, 2020

Is universalism the best possible news?

@RandalRauser
The second worst objection to Christian universalism: “If everybody is ultimately saved by Jesus, then why bother telling anybody?” 

Um, because it’s the best possible news. 

And God told us to.

And no, I'm not a universalist. I just can't stand bad arguments.


1. It's a pity that Rauser's aversion to bad arguments never extends to his own bad arguments. 

2. God didn't tell us to proclaim universalism.

3. Even if you suppose that Scripture teaches universalism, Rauser thinks Scripture is riddled with false teaching, so how does he know that God told us to evangelize?

4. God doesn't command evangelism for its own sake, but to give the lost an opportunity to be saved. If, however, universalism is true, then no one is lost, so the exercise is pointless. Rauser acts like we should mechanically obey the command after he eviscerates the purpose of the command. But God doesn't command things for the sake of commanding things. 

5. Is universalism the best possible news? Suppose Rauser unwittingly hitched a ride with a psychopathic killer. Suppose the psycho subdues him and takes him back to his cabin, to torture him for the next six months until Rauser succumbs to his horrific injuries. Suppose Rauser is very eloquent. He can either convince the psycho that there's nothing the psycho can do to him which will prevent the psycho from experiencing eternal bliss, or else he can convince the psycho that if he tortures Rauser for the next 6 months, the psycho will suffer eternally in hell. What's the best possible news to tell the psycho? 

No comments:

Post a Comment