Pages

Thursday, February 20, 2020

Why be Christian rather than Jewish?

A friend asked me how I'd argued against Rabbinic Judaism. What makes Christianity right and Rabbinic Judaism wrong. The question is significant in part because Rabbinic Judaism is the only serious religious rival to Christianity. And it's significant in witnessing to Jews. 

1. I'm distinguishing pre-Christian Judaism (OT Judaism/Second Temple Judaism) from post-Christian Judaism (Rabbinic Judaism). 

2. There's a sense in which it's easier to prove pre-Christian Judaism backwards. Begin with Christianity, then prove pre-Christian Judaism in reverse. There's less evidence for Judaism, considered in isolation, than Christianity. It's easier to make a case for Christianity than Judaism apart from Christianity.

3. The evidence for Christianity includes the argument from prophecy. In many cases, OT prophecies fulfilled in Jesus or NT times. But of course, Rabbinic Jews don't think those prophecies were fulfilled in Jesus and the new covenant. This means that according to Rabbinic Judaism, the OT still contains many outstanding prophecies. Yet when centuries or even millennia pass and nothing happens, that raises the nagging suspicion: are these genuine prophecies remaining to be fulfilled or failed prophecies which will never happen?

4. In fairness, Rabbinic Jews might level the same charge regarding the Second Coming of Christ. But there's a difference:

i) The first coming of Christ gives us a downpayment or precedent. That's reason to believe there's more to come, and it's not just wishful thinking.

ii) Christianity is a global missionary religion in a way that Judaism is not. Therefore, Christianity requires centuries to achieve its goal. In the nature of the case, Christianity takes a long-range view, to save as many of the elect as God has chosen, through many generations in time and space. 

5. If we had nothing but the OT to go by, some oracles seem to be failed prophecies. For instance, the new temple in Ezk 40-48 appears to envision what awaits the exiles when they return to the Promised Land. But of course, nothing like that happened. Christianity has room and resources to accommodate that vision in a way that an OT boundary does not. 

6. There's also the question of whether it's too late for some OT prophecies to be fulfilled if they haven't come true by now. For instance:
There is only one Messiah, but there are two parts to his mission, hence two comings, but the first had to precede the destruction of the Second Temple as we learn from Haggai 2 (where God promised to fill the Second Temple with greater glory than the First Temple, yet the Second Temple did not have the Shekhinah or the divine fire or even the ark of the covenant); Malachi 3 (where the Lord Himself promised to visit the Second Temple and purge the priests and Levites); and Daniel 9 (where the measure of transgression and sin had to be filled up, atonement made for iniquity, and everlasting righteousness ushered in). 
Yeshua fulfilled these prophecies, bringing the glory of God to the Temple with his own presence and sending the Spirit to his followers there, and as the Lord, visiting the Temple and purging and purifying the Jewish leadership. And the measure of transgression was filled up when the Messiah was crucified, at which time he made atonement for iniquity and ushered in eternal righteousness. And so Haggai, Malachi, and Daniel testify that the Messiah had to come before the Second Temple was destroyed. 
This is why we also have two pictures of the Messiah’s coming, one meek and lowly, riding on a donkey (Zech 9:9), the other high and exalted, riding on the clouds (Dan 7:13-14). But these are not either-or pictures, they are both-and pictures. First he comes riding on a donkey, to be rejected by our people, to die for our sins, only to become a light to the nations of the earth; then he will return riding on the clouds, bringing judgment on the wicked, regathering his scattered people, and establishing God’s kingdom on the earth. 
https://askdrbrown.org/library/dr-brown-notes-debate-yisroel-blumenthal-real-jewish-messiah
These are keyed to Second Temple Judaism. If it didn't happen before the temple was razed, then we passed the last exit on the freeway 2000 years ago. There are no future opportunities for their fulfillment. Jesus is the best and only viable candidate. 

7. Another problem is that Jews have been unable to practice the Mosaic Covenant for 2000 years. That makes for a truncated religion. But how can Judaism still be the right option if it can't be practiced, as commanded, for such long stretches of time? What Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox Jews practice isn't Judaism as divinely prescribed in the OT, but a faith-tradition reinvented by rabbis to adjust to a world without the Mosaic cultus. Yet to that extent it's just a human construct.  

It might be said that the Babylonian Exile provides a partial precedent. But that had a portable tabernacle in the form of the chariot-theophany and the Shekinah (Ezk 1; 10; esp. 11:16). The Shekinah tabernacle followed them into exile. But what's the counterpart in the experience of Rabbinic Jews?

8. Another evidence for Christianity is the argument from miracles, answered prayer, special providences, and Christophanies. But do Rabbinic Jews have the same  experience?

On the one hand I'm not suggesting that God never answers the prayers of Rabbinic Jews. On the other hand, I'm not suggesting that God always answers Christian prayer. But consider the secularized Judaism of Mordecai Kaplan. Is that conditioned in large part by the despairing experience of a God who doesn't answer Jewish prayers. Of a God who doesn't intervene in Jewish lives? Do miracles, answered prayer, and special providences cluster around Christianity in a way that's not the case for Rabbinic Judaism? Consider evidence for an uptick in miracles when Christian missionaries break new ground on a virgin mission field, reaching the unreached. They're often opposed by indigenous paganism, witchcraft, and demonic attack. They must respond with exorcisms and healing miracles. 

And what about the role of Christophanies in church history, up to the present? Take Muslims who experience dreams and visions of Jesus, which are instrumental to their conversion. 

In the same vein it would be useful to have a representative survey comparing the experience of Rabbinic Jews with Messianic Jews. Is God more manifest in the lives of Messianic Jews than Rabbinic Jews? Michael Brown tells me there's big difference. 

9. What is the ultimate point of the sacrificial system in the Mosaic covenant? Christianity has an explanation.

7 comments:

  1. I used to be involved with Jewish evangelism (e.g. Chabad, Aish HaTorah). I've never heard of Jewish friends or acquaintances experiencing miracles or answered prayers except in a vague way. Like reading Chinese tea leaves or seeing faces or shapes in the clouds. However, I think among the Messianic Jews who had left Judaism there seemed to have been more concrete answered prayers and special providences. For example, I seem to remember a lady who had become a Messianic Jew due to some naturally inexplicable coincidences involving her family and moving cross country. Anyway there's a decent website called One for Israel. The website has a section called "I met Messiah" that contains video testimonies of many Messianic Jews (e.g. James Tour). Some of these testimonies include claims of the miraculous (e.g. literally seeing Jesus).

    ReplyDelete
  2. In addition to what Steve has already said in his post:

    1. I think another reason not to be Jewish is because rabbinic Judaism makes up a bunch of laws that aren't biblical or biblically-based. At best, they're derived from Jewish tradition with some loose or ambiguous connections to the Bible. In this respect, it's precisely what Jesus criticized the Pharisees for. If I was deciding between Judaism and Christianity, I could read the Gospels which would give me a window into 1st century Judaism. I'd be able to see how many of the things Jews practice today were quite problematic to other Jews in Jesus' day including to Jesus himself.

    2. The level of vitriol in the Talmud against Jesus and his (Jewish) followers would make me wonder why they hated Jesus so much. In fact, it'd be offputting, because it'd seem so unreasonable and irrational, given an objective look at the history of the period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. -- In this respect, it's precisely what Jesus criticized the Pharisees for.--

      Well what is to be expected when the Wikipedia entry for Rabbinic Judaism outright states that it descends from the Gamaliel school of the Pharisees!

      Delete
  3. Modern Rabbinic Judaism owes more to Islam than to Second Temple and earlier Jewish belief.

    From 5:00 and especially from 7:00 to 9:18, Jewish scholar Benjamin D. Sommer explains to his Jewish audience that it was Maimonides and his fellow medieval rabbis who overturned Tanakh, Talmud and Mishna up to that point and gave modern Judaism its non-embodied God. From 1:36:00 for about a minute, he outright states that Maimonides’ main influence was the surrounding Islamic thinkers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtSm-InTLoA [Note too that the Islamically-influenced Maimonides also replaced echad (compound one) in the Shema with yachid (absolute one).]

    By now it should be well known that the Two Powers in Heaven belief among Second Temple Jews was only declared heretical by the Jewish religious leaders in the 2nd Century AD. Jewish scholar Alan F. Segal writes about that.

    This is echoed by Jewish scholar Daniel Boyarin who points out that Christian and Jewish religious leaders intentionally supported having different beliefs in order to partition their respective communities from mixing. The effect of this was that Jews distanced themselves from OT-based beliefs that smacked too much of Christian doctrines.

    Similarly, (nonJewish scholar) Michael Heiser covers at length various Second Temple Jewish groups that believed in such things as two messianic comings, Messiah ben Joseph who must suffer and die, a human ascending to godhood, and many other 'Christian innovations' - the point being, Jews already came to interpret these things from the Old Testament long before yet another Jewish group 'The sect of the Nazarenes' (Acts 24:5) came to similar conclusions.

    -----What Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox Jews practice isn't Judaism as divinely prescribed in the OT, but faith-tradition reinvented by rabbis to adjust to a world without the Mosaic cultus. Yet to that extent it's just a human construct.-----

    I note the similar models of Rabbinic Judaism, the RCC and Islam - each has a holy scripture, yet often what it literally states is superceded by the intepretation of human committees and tradition (Talmud, Magisterium, Hadith/Sunna/Sharia).

    -----9. What is the ultimate point of the sacrificial system in the Mosaic covenant? Christianity has an explanation.-----

    Same goes for the Binding of Isaac, the Passover lamb with no bones broken (NB: the marrow inside is the BEST, most nutritious part to eat!), Moses punished for striking the rock for water the second time, and countless other seeming Chekov's Guns that never get fired in the span of the OT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great points by Steve and everyone. Scott, you wrote:

      //[Note too that the Islamically-influenced Maimonides also replaced echad (compound one) in the Shema with yachid (absolute one).]//

      A minor correction. As I understand it, echad doesn't mean compound one. It just means "one", but can accommodate compound unity. Dr. Brown explains it HERE. It's important to get this correct because NT Unitarians, non-Messianic Jews and Muslims have caught Trinitarians on this error multiple times.

      //Moses punished for striking the rock for water the second time, and countless other seeming Chekov's Guns that never get fired in the span of the OT.//

      Yes, there are many/"countless". Another major "Chekov Gun" is Gen. 22:14:

      14 So Abraham called the name of that place, "The LORD will provide"; as it is said to this day, "On the mount of the LORD it shall be provided."

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the clarification. I shall more specifically describe it as 'One that can be compound' from now on. Lakad matatag!

      Why does 'as it is said to this day' make Gen 22:14 a Chekov's Gun?

      Delete
  4. The Messiah had to be born in Bethlehem. But Bethlehem is now an Arab city.

    ReplyDelete