Pages

Friday, April 08, 2016

“Pope Francis” on “The Joy of Sex”

#JoyOfPapacy #BlueprintForAnarchy #Rome’sDividedMind
That’s how the conservative Rorate-Caeli blog has tagged its pre-release summary of the “Apostolic Exortation” entitled “Amoris Laetitia”. The official English translation is “The Joy of Love”, but Rorate and other conservative Roman Catholic sites are calling it “The Joy of Sex”.

The conservative [and therefore infallible] website One Peter Five has provided some “interpretations” that it can foresee some lesser cardinals and bishops taking:

The eighth chapter is an invitation to mercy and pastoral discernment in situations that do not fully match what the Lord proposes[Read: sinful relationships and situations.] The Pope uses three very important verbs: guiding, discerning and integrating, which are fundamental in addressing fragile, complex or irregular situations. [“Irregular” is a dangerous word. Does this include homosexual relationships?] The chapter has sections on the need for gradualness in pastoral care; the importance of discernment; norms and mitigating circumstances in pastoral discernment; and finally what the Pope calls the “logic of pastoral mercy”.
Chapter eight is very sensitive[Read: controversial] In reading it one must remember that “the Church’s task is often like that of a field hospital” (AL 291). Here the Holy Father grapples with the findings of the Synods on controversial issues. He reaffirms what Christian marriage is and adds that “some forms of union radically contradict this ideal, while others realize it in at least a partial and analogous way”. The Church therefore “does not disregard the constructive elements in those situations which do not yet or no longer correspond to her teaching on marriage” (AL 292). [This sentence echoes Cardinal Schönborn’s comments on the “positive elements” to be found even in situations of cohabitation, etc.]
As far as discernment with regard to “irregular” situations is concerned, the Pope states: “There is a need ‘to avoid judgements which do not take into account the complexity of various situations’ and to be attentive, by necessity, to how people experience distress because of their condition’” (AL 296). And he continues: “It is a matter of reaching out to everyone, of needing to help each person find his or her proper way of participating in the ecclesial community, and thus to experience being touched by an ‘unmerited, unconditional and gratuitous’ mercy” (AL 297). And further: “The divorced who have entered a new union, for example, can find themselves in a variety of situations, which should not be pigeonholed or fit into overly rigid classifications leaving no room for a suitable personal and pastoral discernment” (AL 298). [This is a caveat you could drive a truck through.]
In this line, gathering the observations of many Synod Fathers, the Pope states that “the baptized who are divorced and civilly remarried need to be more fully integrated into Christian communities in the variety of ways possible, while avoiding any occasion of scandal”. “Their participation can be expressed in different ecclesial services… Such persons need to feel not as excommunicated members of the Church, but instead as living members, able to live and grow in the Church… This integration is also needed in the care and Christian upbringing of their children” (AL 299). [Cardinal Brandmüller’s comments yesterday appear to directly address this assertion: “This is valid also with regard to the attempt to integrate into the Church those who live in an invalid ‘second marriage’ by admitting them to liturgical, catechetical and other functions.” This path, in his eyes, would lead to “conflicts,” “embarrassments,” and an “undermining of the Church’s sacred proclamation.”]
In a more general vein, the Pope makes an extremely important statement for understanding the orientation and meaning of the Exhortation: “If we consider the immense variety of concrete situations, … it is understandable that neither the Synod nor this Exhortation could be expected to provide a new set of general rules, canonical in nature and applicable to all cases. What is needed is simply a renewed encouragement to undertake a responsible personal and pastoral discernment of particular cases, one which would recognize that, since ‘the degree of responsibility is not equal in all cases’, the consequences or effects of a rule need not necessarily always be the same” (AL 300). The Pope develops in depth the needs and characteristics of the journey of accompaniment and discernment necessary for profound dialogue between the faithful and their pastors. [Read: we’re not going to reiterate existing rules of objective conduct, nor will we offer new ones; instead, we’re going to leave it to your conscience to decide.]
For this purpose the Holy Father recalls the Church’s reflection on “mitigating factors and situations” regarding the attribution of responsibility and accountability for actions; and relying on St. Thomas Aquinas[There’s a head fake for all you “doctors of the law”] he focuses on the relationship between rules and discernment by stating: “It is true that general rules set forth a good which can never be disregarded or neglected, but in their formulation they cannot provide absolutely for all particular situations. At the same time, it must be said that, precisely for that reason, what is part of a practical discernment in particular circumstances cannot be elevated to the level of a rule” (AL 304).
The last section of the chapter treats “The logic of pastoral mercy”. To avoid misunderstandings, Pope Francis strongly reiterates: “To show understanding in the face of exceptional situations never implies dimming the light of the fuller ideal, or proposing less than what Jesus offers to the human being. Today, more important than the pastoral care of failures is the pastoral effort to strengthen marriages and thus to prevent their breakdown” (AL 307).
The overall sense of the chapter and of the spirit that Pope Francis wishes to impart to the pastoral work of the Church is well summed up in the closing words: “I encourage the faithful who find themselves in complicated situations to speak confidently with their pastors or with other lay people whose lives are committed to the Lord. They may not always encounter in them a confirmation of their own ideas or desires, but they will surely receive some light to help them better understand their situation and discover a path to personal growth. I also encourage the Church’s pastors to listen to them with sensitivity and serenity, with a sincere desire to understand their plight and their point of view, in order to help them live better lives and to recognize their proper place in the Church.” (AL 312).
On the “logic of pastoral mercy”, Pope Francis emphasizes: “At times we find it hard to make room for God’s unconditional love in our pastoral activity. We put so many conditions on mercy that we empty it of its concrete meaning and real significance. That is the worst way of watering down the Gospel” (AL 311). [God’s love may be unconditional, but His mercy isn’t. It requires real repentance, and a change of life. No mention of that here so far.]
#JoyOfPapacy #BlueprintForAnarchy #Rome’sDividedMind

7 comments:

  1. Great commentary on weasel words heralding a another blow to Rome's claim of being changeless. Given your history there, what do you see as Bergie's main motive: increasing market share (greater number of libs in than conservatives out), influence, believing his own kaka de toro?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Kirk, I'm out running around right now. Let me give some thought to your question and get back to you here.

      Delete
    2. looking forward to your thought as always.

      Delete
    3. Kirk, I honestly believe that Bergoglio drinks (and believes) his own Kool Aid. It may be that he sees that one big flow out of RCism is the tide of divorced-and-remarried, and he's trying to address that very big problem. I believe he showed his hand in one of those off-the-cuff Scalfari interviews:

      The Council Fathers knew that being open to modern culture meant religious ecumenism and dialogue with non-believers. But afterwards very little was done in that direction. I have the humility and ambition to want to do something.

      … providence has placed me at the head of the Church and the Diocese of Peter. I will do what I can to fulfill the mandate that has been entrusted to me.

      I am the Bishop of Rome and Pope of the Catholic world. The first thing I decided was to appoint a group of eight cardinals to be my advisers. Not courtiers but wise people who share my own feelings. This is the beginning of a Church with an organization that is not just top-down but also horizontal. When Cardinal Martini talked about focusing on the councils and synods he knew how long and difficult it would be to go in that direction. Gently, but firmly and tenaciously.


      http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2013/10/pope-francis-is-cleaning-house.html

      Delete
  2. Its pretty simple to sum up Francis. He is a liberal jesuit who wants to transform Rome into a liberal mainstream protestant denomination. Thats his goal and mission. What is so troubeling is that what Francis says and does affects all of Christianity, especially sinces he dialogues with many evangelicals and EO's all the time, and many are warming up to him and like him. It would be a fatal mistake to be indifferent to Francis and treat him as he is a threat only to those conservatives within the Roman communion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vincent, I'm pretty sure you're right about the dangers -- I cringe when I see or hear of conservative Protestants who speak well of him -- but I'm sure he does not want to "transform Rome into a liberal mainstream protestant denomination". That's fairly simplistic. Although he is clearly influenced by a variety of liberal sources, I think he's "flying by his own lights", and he genuinely thinks he is improving things.

      Delete
    2. He may not want to do that, but that seems to be what he is doing: evolution, relaxed sexual and marital norms, soft-pedaling distinctives...everything the libs did. I can only wish him much success.

      Delete