Arminians try to draw an invidious contrast between limited atonement and unlimited atonement. But that's equivocal. What do Arminians even mean by the atonement?
Take this book:
http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Atonement_Debate.html?id=sqZTEF4hjpwC
Two of the contributors are Joel Green and I. H. Marshall. They are premier Arminian NT scholars.
When Arminians promote unlimited atonement, is the "atonement" a placeholder to be filled in differently by different Arminians?
No comments:
Post a Comment