I have also commented on the softer feminism held by Rachel Held here- http://vanberean.blogspot.ca/2012/08/beauty-in-submission_17.html
An inequality that she feels is to be rectified in this life.
But I think the operative issue remains the interpretation of Gen. 3:16.
With the fundamental divide being clearly illustrated with the closing comments between Wendy Alsup and Martin Shields here- http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/09/17/problems-with-a-new-reading-of-an-old-verse/?comments#comments
For anyone interested,
ReplyDeleteI have also commented on the softer feminism held by Rachel Held here-
http://vanberean.blogspot.ca/2012/08/beauty-in-submission_17.html
An inequality that she feels is to be rectified in this life.
But I think the operative issue remains the interpretation of Gen. 3:16.
With the fundamental divide being clearly illustrated with the closing comments between Wendy Alsup and Martin Shields here-
http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/09/17/problems-with-a-new-reading-of-an-old-verse/?comments#comments