Round up on dispensationalism

In this post I’ve collated my impromptu debate over dispensationalism–along with some supplementary material. I don’t normally debate dispensationalism. It’s not one of my theological priorities. If I woke up tomorrow believing what Darrel Bock or S. Lewis Johnson believe, that wouldn’t require a major adjustment in my theology.

The only reason I ending up discussing this recently is because Paul Henebury commented on a post of mine. So that generated some back-and-forth.

As a Protestant, I’m comfortable with a certain amount of theological diversity. In eschatology, the only position I consider to be out-of-bounds is preterism. 


http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/typetoken.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/new-exodus.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/futures-not-what-it-used-to-be.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/meaning-of-meaning.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/salva-veritate.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/types-shadows.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/back-to-future.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-did-first-hearers-hear.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/signs-of-times.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/hermeneutic-of-suspicion.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/dispensationalist-on-dispensationalism.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/rocinante-to-rescue.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-does-face-value-meaning-mean.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/dispensational-equivocations-and.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/dispensational-hermeneutics.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/perspectives-on-ezekiel.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/double-trouble.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/temple-trebled.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/apotelesmatic-interpretation.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/varieties-of-dispensationalism.html