You don't find this is an egregious power grab on the part of the state?
It sounds like we'd agree with one another here.
BTW, if Obama is re-elected, it's possible he won't find the need to keep as close an eye on the polls as he has in his first term. If he's already trying to force his policies on the nation, he'll arguably try to do so all the more if given a second term.
This led me to wonder what you all think about the Obama administration's ruling re: contraception.
ReplyDeleteOr the mandatory coverage thereof, regardless of conscience.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thinkingchristian.net/2012/01/brave-new-world-uk-ethicist-wants-women-to-abandon-motherhood-use-artificial-wombs/
ReplyDeletePhilip Jude asked:
ReplyDeleteThis led me to wonder what you all think about the Obama administration's ruling re: contraception.
Speaking for myself, I don't see why employers should be required to provide employees with contraceptives (e.g. the morning after pill).
Forgive me if I misinterpret your tone, but you seem fairly nonchalant. You don't find this is an egregious power grab on the part of the state?
ReplyDeletePhilip Jude said:
ReplyDeleteyou seem fairly nonchalant
Maybe I should type in all caps? ;-)
You don't find this is an egregious power grab on the part of the state?
It sounds like we'd agree with one another here.
BTW, if Obama is re-elected, it's possible he won't find the need to keep as close an eye on the polls as he has in his first term. If he's already trying to force his policies on the nation, he'll arguably try to do so all the more if given a second term.
Sorry to jump all over you! ;-)
ReplyDelete