Pages

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Ambulance chasers


DAVE ARMSTRONG SAID:

It's now past six hours since I documented how cathmom had apologized, and still no acceptance of it here, in Christian charity. Why should it take so long? Is it not part of Reformed Christianity to accept and acknowledge a heartfelt apology when it is offered? It was certainly part of my evangelical Christianity.
 
On my blog she even said she went to confession over it, so obviously she is sincere in intent. Or is that what you deny? Otherwise, why the great gap in response?
 
Catholics say "I'm sorry" or "I apologize" to other human beings, just like everyone else (!). It's Christianity 0101, but it seems to be such an advanced Christianity for Steve, that he doesn't grasp it. It's too much fun running down Catholics, to pause and say "I accept your apology." Pretty novel and bizarre stuff, huh Steve?

First of all, I don’t ordinarily handle communications from Dave. I normally delegate that sort of thing to my personal assistant, Pepper Potts.

Secondly, I was having dinner with Beyoncé Friday night, so I instructed Miss Potts not to disturb me unless there was some ecoanarchoterrorist attack on one of my subsidiaries.

Third, cathmom’s qualified apology is irrelevant. I never sought an apology. I wasn’t personally wronged by cathmom. I wasn’t offended by her tirade. That was never the point.

The initial point was to simply expose the quality of reasoning you typically find among lay Catholic epologists. Having succeeded, there’s nothing more to say at my end.

Fourth, why did Armstrong reedit his post to scrub all references to cathomom (“I have reposted the following remarks, that were in this combox, so as to uphold the anonymity of the woman who made them”), only to turn right around and demand a public acknowledgment on my part? If protecting her anonymity is now the priority, how's that consistent with demanding a public acknowledgement from me concerning her?

Fifth, there were several parties to this imbroglio. In addition to cathmom there’s Scott Windsor. But Windsor, rather than accepting rational correction, has chosen to dig in his heels.

So there’s nothing for me to “acknowledge” on that score, even if I was under some (imaginary) obligation to do so.

Sixth, Armstrong’s contribution would have been preferable had he not turned this into yet another pretext for self-aggrandizement. But by hogging the limelight, his intervention now looks purely opportunistic.

7 comments:

  1. Classic Hays rhetoric and sophistry!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dave,

    might I chime, "classic" Dave!

    Steve,

    might I make a public suggestion with regard to these words?:

    "...If protecting her anonymity is now the priority, how's that consistent with demanding a public acknowledgement from me concerning her?

    Putting aside that valiant inconsistency, go into your private quarters, turn out the lights, and whisper a private acknowledgement and leave it at that.

    The Righteous still live by His Faith and somethings what one does privately seems nothing at all and inconsistent publicly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While the Christians are arguing among themselves, the atheists are taking the college campuses.

    "See how they love one another."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Morrison said:

    While the Christians are arguing among themselves, the atheists are taking the college campuses.

    "See how they love one another."


    1. There are significant enough distinctions between Catholics and Protestants for us to engage one another in important debate.

    2. It's not as if this is a zero-sum game where if we are "arguing among [our]selves," we can't do anything else. We can do more than one thing at a time.

    3. As far as Triablogue is concerned, we've done plenty of work against atheists. Work which has been used by college students too. Work which has helped college students. For example, Steve's "Why I Believe" two part series has been given to university students who have found it quite helpful.

    4. I doubt you know what we do or don't do outside of blogging. Many Tbloggers have done considerable work against atheists on college campuses including most importantly preaching the gospel to them (e.g. Dusman).

    5. Your statement implicitly "argues" against us as well. So, by your lights, you're spending at least a little bit of time "arguing" with us while "the atheists are taking the college campuses." See how you love us!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sorry Mr Hays but the fact of the matter is you come across as a bit of an as*hole in this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Erika,

    Thanks for your anti-intellectual comment.

    ReplyDelete