Pages

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Roman Catholic Ecclesiology: The Church that Roman Catholics Believe In Today

Many Reformed believers have heard Warfield’s statement that “The Reformation was the ultimate triumph of Augustine’s doctrine of grace over Augustine’s doctrine of the Church” (B. B. Warfield, Calvin and Augustine).What Reformed thinkers have to grapple with is that Rome, in its post-Vatican II doctrines, has sidestepped the issues surrounding grace and justification, and has, in effect, doubled down on its ecclesiology as “the means of salvation”.

Here’s a sample of what I mean:
The opening words of the [Vatican II] Constitution on the [Roman Catholic] Church Lumen Gentium, “the light of the nations,” refer not to the church but to Christ. But the next sentence introduces the church as “in Christ a kind of sacrament: that is, a sign and instrument of intimate union with God and the unity of all humanity … [Consider] St. Augustine’s description of the origin of the church: “It was from the side of Christ as he slept on the cross that there came forth the wondrous sacrament which is the whole church.” This one sentence suggests some of the reasons that prompted St. Augustine to describe the church as sacramentum where the word clearly means “mystery.” First of all, he sees the church as the fruit of Christ’s passion and death, thus having its origin not in a mere act of institution, but in the redemptive work accomplished by Christ on the cross. He sees the church as symbolized by the blood and water that flowed out from the side of Christ: no doubt because this blood and water were identified with the sacraments of baptism and eucharist, the most fundamental elements in the life of the church. Finally, the reference to Christ “sleeping the sleep of death” presents Christ as the “new Adam” from whose side the church came forth as the “new Eve,” thus suggesting that as the first Eve was drawn from Adam’s side to be his bride and “helper (Gen 2:18), so the church is the bride of Christ who has a helping role to play in Christ’s ongoing work for the salvation of humanity…. No mere human institution could be described in terms such as these.

Article seven [of Lumen Gentium] develops further aspects of this doctrine, found mainly in Colossians and Ephesians. In these letters St. Paul introduced an idea that he had not used in the earlier letters, namely, that of Christ as head of his body the church…. The final paragraph involves the passage of Eph 5:22-28 where St Paul applies to Christ and his church the idea from Gen 2:24 that a man and his wife become “one flesh.” So also, the church is both Christ’s bride and his body, which he loves, nourishes and cherishes, fills with divine gifts…. [Francis A. Sullivan, S.J., “The Church We Believe In: One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic”, New York/Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, ©1988, pgs. 9].
Sullivan is a Roman Catholic theologian, a professor of Theology at the Gregorian University in Rome. This is foundational to what the post Vatican II Roman Catholic Church thinks about itself. In fact, the Roman Catholic Church equates itself and its hierarchical structure, its “sacramental priesthood,” its continuing “succession” of priests with this image of “one church”. One can imagine why they think this is a good thing. It is a winsome story that ties the Roman Church today with this “bride of Christ” that was “mysteriously” born “while Christ slept on the cross.”

Here are some of the foundational doctrinal statements from Vatican II that clarify this meaning (from Sullivan):
In three important documents, Vatican II has further developed this concept [of church as sacrament] by speaking of the church as the universal sacrament of salvation. In Lumen Gentium we read: “Christ, having been lifted up from the earth, is drawing all men to himself (John 12:32). Rising from the dead, he sent his life-giving Spirit upon his disciples and through this Spirit has established his body, the church, as the universal sacrament of salvation” (LG 48). Gaudium et Spes declares: While helping the world and receiving many benefits from it, the church has a single intention: that God’s kingdom may come, and that the salvation of the whole human race may come to pass. For every benefit which the People of God during its earthly pilgrimage can offer to the human family stems from the fact that the church is the ‘universal sacrament of salvation,’ simultaneously manifesting and exercising the mystery of God’s love for man” (GS 45). Finally, the decree on the Church’s Missionary Activity (Ad gentes: AG) opens with the statement “The church has been divinely sent to all nations that she might be ‘the universal sacrament of salvation’” (AG 1)

The appearance of the word “universal” in these texts suggests that we are dealing with an aspect of the catholicity of the church. If the role of the church as sign and instrument of salvation really means that the church not only signifies but helps to bring about the salvation of everyone who is saved, we have another important reason for professing our belief in the church as “catholic.” In this chapter we shall have to see in what sense the church [“the Roman Catholic Church”] can be said to be both a sign and instrument of salvation, and what grounds there are for claiming a universal role for it in the salvation of all humanity.

… We have seen that there is no salvation without the grace of Christ, and that every offer of grace is intrinsically directed toward the church, even when it does not bring about actual membership in the church on earth. In this sense, the catholicity of the church consists in the fact that the universal offer of grace involves a relationship to the church on the part of every human person—a relationship, to be sure, that will vary according to the response each person makes to God’s grace. [“All who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are brought into a certain, though imperfect communion with the Catholic Church”. This “certain, though imperfect communion” also is extended to non-believers.] In some cases, as we have seen, people respond to grace in such a way as to enter into spiritual communion with the church, living in Christ without knowing him as the source of their supernatural life. In other cases, a person may not have responded, and yet the offer continues to be made. The common factor here is that everyone without exception is placed in some relationship to [the Roman Catholic Church]. All those who do not actually belong to her are at least “ordered toward her” (ad eam ordinatur) [Sullivan, 109-110].
So you, my friend, according to Rome, are saved because “the Roman Catholic Church” is the “universal sacrament of salvation,” because “all grace of salvation is not only ordered toward [the Roman Catholic Church], but in some way comes fromand through the [Roman Catholic] Church. As a sign and instrument of all salvation, the church is not merely the goal toward which grace is directed, it is the channel or medium through which grace is given. You are in a “certain, though imperfect communion” already with the Roman Catholic Church.

This is the reason you’ll find the following language in the CCC:
The Second Vatican Council’s Decree on Ecumenism explains: “For it is through Christ’s Catholic Church alone, which is the universal help toward salvation, that the fullness of the means of salvation can be obtained. It was to the apostolic college alone, of which Peter is the head, that we believe that our Lord entrusted all the blessings of the New Covenant, in order to establish on earth the one Body of Christ into which all those should be fully incorporated who belong in any way to the People of God.

“However, one cannot charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities [of the Reformation that resulted from such separation] and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers . . . . All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church.”

… the Church is catholic because Christ is present in her. “Where there is Christ Jesus, there is the Catholic Church.”

“All men are called to this catholic unity of the People of God. . . . And to it, in different ways, belong or are ordered: the Catholic faithful, others who believe in Christ, and finally all mankind, called by God’s grace to salvation.”

“Those who have not yet received the Gospel are related to the People of God in various ways.”

“The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”

The Church’s bond with non-Christian religions is in the first place the common origin and end of the human race: …

The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as “a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life.”

To reunite all his children, scattered and led astray by sin, the Father willed to call the whole of humanity together into his Son’s Church. The Church is the place where humanity must rediscover its unity and salvation. The Church is “the world reconciled.” …

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience – those too may achieve eternal salvation. (Selections from the Catechism of the Catholic Church, 811-847).
When we see converts to Roman Catholicism today, this is the “gospel” that they are buying into. Rome may be losing members, but Rome is not going to let you alone. You are saved, according to Rome, because Rome exists as the universal sacrament of salvation.

11 comments:

  1. "What Reformed thinkers have to grapple with is that Rome, in its post-Vatican II doctrines, has sidestepped the issues surrounding grace and justification, and has, in effect, doubled down on its ecclesiology as “the means of salvation”."

    Sometimes I wonder whether ecclesiology is a false idol for some Roman Catholics or EO's.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sometimes I wonder whether ecclesiology is a false idol for some Roman Catholics ...

    Well, yes, it is a false idol. Here it is the "universal sacrament of salvation". Unpacking what that means takes a bit of doing. I've also seen it described as "the ongoing incarnation of Christ". One writer over at Beggars All kept saying "The Church IS Jesus Christ". I'm sure this in some part responsible for some of the seemingly loyal devotion on the part of its members.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I appreciate Rome explicitly setting itself apart as a non-Christian denomination by aligning itself with Allah. If Catholics worship Allah, then at least we know for sure they don't worship God.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Dominic, you raise a good point, and I know that there are lots of lucky folks out there who will just look at Rome and say "apostate", with no hesitation or second thoughts.

    Growing up as a fairly devout Roman Catholic, I had a much harder time coming to that conclusion (although I have come to that conclusion after much study).

    ReplyDelete
  5. "One writer over at Beggars All kept saying "The Church IS Jesus Christ"."

    Pretty pantheistic attitude, eroding the fundamental Biblical duality between Creator and creature (while using Jesus Christ's incarnation as a pious excuse for divinizing the world or part of the world).

    But I think we could say that the whole RC doctrine of Transubstantiation itself encourages at least semi-pantheistic notions by teaching that Jesus Christ becomes literally absorbed to us (and by implication, we to Him).

    Theologians like Teilhard de Chardin or Ratzinger only need to take this traditional RC logic of the Mass one or two steps further when they talk about "cosmos becoming a living host".

    ReplyDelete
  6. And thus the term "ecclesiolatry" would not be a mere hostile Protestant label but a quite decriptive word indeed - for if "the church" really IS Jesus Christ, then the church is a worthy subject of Latria-worship!

    After all, RC doctors like Thomas Aquinas have taught that images of crosses of Christ are worthy of LATRIA - wouldn't the Holy Mother Church itself be even much more Latria-worthy, believers being more true "images of Christ" than any picture or cross made by human hands could be?

    ReplyDelete
  7. And thus the term "ecclesiolatry" would not be a mere hostile Protestant label but a quite decriptive word indeed - for if "the church" really IS Jesus Christ, then the church is a worthy subject of Latria-worship!

    Viisaus, I really think it will be important to sort this all out, so that Protestants do understand what's going on. Not everybody will find this interesting, but it's important to know just how far Rome has deviated from Biblical, historical Christianity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Not everybody will find this interesting, but it's important to know just how far Rome has deviated from Biblical, historical Christianity."

    Those unreconstructed Protestants of old who identified Rome with the Harlot of Revelation 17 thought that the wine in the golden cup that the Harlot is holding symbolizes all sorts of cunning and seductive, "adulterous" doctrines that drive the world crazy with intoxication.

    Many of the worst doctrines of Rome are "esoteric" (like the never-officially-repudiated license to deceive heretics) - they are not held in plain sight, are often unknown to ordinary RC laymen themselves, and thus are not noticed by careless outside researchers.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I always appreciate the careful research that you bring to bear on these topics.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "I appreciate Rome explicitly setting itself apart as a non-Christian denomination by aligning itself with Allah."

    Traditional Protestants have always considered Rome to be a more or less syncretistic outfit - check out this classic sermon of C.H. Spurgeon, "Mongrel Religion", where he in passing compares the RCC to the sect of Samaritans - so can anyone be TRULY surprised that the Vatican has now become more brazenly syncretistic than ever?

    They began to pander to the tastes of the world ("the doctrine of Balaam") already when the cult of the saints sprung up, and are now only going further on that pernicious path.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "But I think we could say that the whole RC doctrine of Transubstantiation itself encourages at least semi-pantheistic notions by teaching that Jesus Christ becomes literally absorbed to us (and by implication, we to Him)."

    Further thought, hopefully not too distasteful: I understand that RCs teach that in the Eucharist, men and God have an intimate relationship that is more or less mutually corresponding.

    But does this mean that Jesus Christ is going to eat and ingest US literally like we supposedly do with Him? That is, is He going to absorb us into His divinity?

    (This would actually fit the generally Monophysite overtones of the Transubstantiation-dogma.)

    ReplyDelete