David said:
If you're born an a[--]hole, you'll be an a[--]hole, regardless of any religious beliefs. All relgion [sic] tends to do is amplify, excuse and sometimes empower a[--]-holyness. Rho's actions repeatedly show that he doesn't really believe that the Bible is the absolute truth. It has no real impact on who he fundamentally is.
Since evidently irreligious people like David are trying to hold Christians like Rhology to their own standards, then why is it wrong if Christians try to hold atheists to their own standards?
"then why is it wrong if Christians try to hold atheists to their own standards?"
ReplyDeleteIt's not wrong.
Just like it's not wrong for conservatives to hold liberals to their own standards.
Great point exactly. If athiests/evolutionists embrace death as normative, which they must, as part of their system, then to emotionalize and rue the death of a favored individual, is duplicity in the highest degree.
ReplyDeleteGreat point exactly. If athiests/evolutionists embrace death as normative, which they must, as part of their system, then to emotionalize and rue the death of a favored individual, is duplicity in the highest degree.
ReplyDeleteI think you are confusing atheists with Vulcans. Why would you think that atheists don't make emotional attachments to others?
rrlane said:
ReplyDelete---
Why would you think that atheists don't make emotional attachments to others?
---
They do. I don't think anyone here has ever claimed atheists were consistent with their worldview.
Some worldviews are simply not internally consistent.
ReplyDelete