Pages

▼

Monday, June 18, 2007

Some resources on the FV & NPP

(Posted on behalf of Steve Hays.)

For those of you who want to dig deeper into the Federal Vision and related issues, here are some resources:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1840635/posts

http://humbleanswers.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/justification/

http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com/tag/heresy/federal-vision/

http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com/tag/heresy/federal-vision/page/2/

http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com/tag/heresy/federal-vision/page/3/

http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com/tag/heresy/federal-vision/page/4/

http://www.paulperspective.com/page7.html

Guy Prentiss Waters, The Federal Vision and Covenant Theology: A Comparative Analysis (P&R, 2006) ISBN 978-1596380332

Gary L. W. Johnson (ed.), Guy P. Waters (ed.), By Faith Alone: Answering the Challenges to the Doctrine of Justification (Crossway Books, 2007) ISBN 978-1581348408

Scott Clark (ed.), Covenant, Justification, and Pastoral Ministry: Essays by the Faculty of Westminster Seminary California (P&R, 2007) ISBN 978-1596380356
at

4 comments:

  1. Anonymous6/18/2007 9:19 PM

    R. Scott Clark also has a large collection of good resources on his own webpage:

    http://wscal.edu/clark/fvnpp.php

    Simon

    ReplyDelete
  2. R. Scott Clark6/19/2007 12:27 AM

    Hi Simon,

    Thanks for these links.

    There is a new pamphlet, "Baptism, Election, and the Covenant of Grace" available from the Reformed Fellowship, by writing to:
    reffellowship@juno.com

    Part of the essay from the Confessional Presbyterian Journal is now online also:
    http://www.cpjournal.com/articles/r-scott-clark-baptism-and-the-benefits-of-christ/

    Best,

    rsc

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous6/19/2007 12:45 PM

    Thanks for considering my material as helpful. I really appreciate your recent critiques of Dawkins, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6/20/2007 1:11 AM

    I thought this was over, but after reading these, I hesitate in jumping to that conclusion. Many people express concerns in these articles what all was decided upon.

    Is there a grandfather clause to it?

    How to proceed with the report is even more uncertain, and that a presbytery that discusses the subject improperly either for or against, is walking over egg shells in doing so.

    ReplyDelete