For those following the recent exchanges over Scripturalism: Aquascum has posted some further comments on several of Vincent Cheung's blog entries (which appear to have been occasioned by Aquascum's original critique).
That Cheung would reply to you means that either his work is "inadequate" or you have written something "earth shattering." He himself said he wouldn't reply unless he found his work inadequate to deal with the argument, or if the critique was earth shattering. From now on, anytime Cheug responds to someone we can assume it's because that someone's critique was a good one. :-)
I have made a small contribution as well: http://presstheantithesis.blogspot.com/2005/06/cheung-knowledge-and-occasionalism.html
ReplyDeleteHello Sharkbait bruhaha,
ReplyDeleteit was probably down because I keep having to tweek little pieces here and there.
That Cheung would reply to you means that either his work is "inadequate" or you have written something "earth shattering." He himself said he wouldn't reply unless he found his work inadequate to deal with the argument, or if the critique was earth shattering. From now on, anytime Cheug responds to someone we can assume it's because that someone's critique was a good one. :-)
ReplyDelete