tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post9171131005244912377..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Why my doctrine of doctrinal development is better than your doctrine of doctrinal development is better than your doctrine of doctrinal development!Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-650960302788476292009-09-15T00:31:05.395-04:002009-09-15T00:31:05.395-04:00Thanks for making the inquiry, Space Bishop.
I...Thanks for making the inquiry, Space Bishop.<br /><br />I'm not particularly persuaded by Dr. Liccione's line of reasoning, but that's what happens when the presuppositional approaches are so widely divergent.<br /><br />Pax.Truth Unites... and Divideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08891402278361538353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-49161924133988023292009-09-14T19:59:57.896-04:002009-09-14T19:59:57.896-04:00Tuad
I asked at licciones blog about the mageste...Tuad <br /><br />I asked at licciones blog about the magesteriums own private judgement that takes place when they are coming to new doctrine. i was told by Mr liccione that the the magesterium is preserved from error by the Holy Spirit. I asked for proof and was told that there is none but that whilst there is none the fact that catholic doctrine has never gone back on itself is evidence that it true. not proof mind you just evidence. <br /><br />I also asked about PJ in the case of a catholic looking at the cathechism and or the teachings of the magesterium- is this not Pj as we protestants would understand it? the response was yes but the difference was that unlike protestatns catholics always have the magesterium to correct them i.e. they have someone who can say " your interpreting that wrong" or "that is not what we are saying" we do not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-83031215791440675502009-03-29T14:35:00.000-04:002009-03-29T14:35:00.000-04:00"So each Catholic epologist comes an idiosyncratic..."So each Catholic epologist comes an idiosyncratic, do-it-yourself version of what the doctrine of development really amounts to. This illustrates the unavoidable recourse to private interpretation."<BR/><BR/>If I were a Catholic epologist, I'd offer up this defense, however weak it must appear, that private interpretation of doctrinal development is not the equivalent to private interpretation of Scripture.<BR/><BR/>I do wonder, however, whether Catholic epologists observe private interpretation occurring with respect to Magisterial interpretation of Scripture. And if so, what is the rejoinder?Truth Unites... and Divideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08891402278361538353noreply@blogger.com