tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post8809128408574170844..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: ObservationsRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-38242259919774337052009-07-24T18:03:54.133-04:002009-07-24T18:03:54.133-04:00Where do you find these guys, TUAD?
:-PWhere do you find these guys, TUAD?<br /><br />:-PPeter Pikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11792036365040378473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-43078331304507887342009-07-24T15:50:57.740-04:002009-07-24T15:50:57.740-04:00"for those concerned with my attitude regardi...<i>"for those concerned with my attitude regarding Arminians"</i><br /><br />Hi Peter,<br /><br />What's your attitude toward this Arminian on this <a href="http://theologica.blogspot.com/2009/07/converasation-between-prayerful-and.html" rel="nofollow">thread</a> at Between Two Worlds in response to an essay by John Piper?Truth Unites... and Divideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08891402278361538353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-71631880061240371062009-07-24T10:42:26.665-04:002009-07-24T10:42:26.665-04:00BTW, for those concerned with my attitude regardin...BTW, for those concerned with my attitude regarding Arminians, I do freely acknowlege that Arminians will reach heaven before Calvinists. For Paul himself states in 1 Thessalonians 4:16, "The dead in Christ will rise first."Peter Pikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11792036365040378473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-28493866654195727972009-07-24T10:39:42.427-04:002009-07-24T10:39:42.427-04:00Quad,
I'm not a geek, I'm a nerd.Quad,<br /><br />I'm not a geek, I'm a nerd.Peter Pikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11792036365040378473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-79626838380104460132009-07-24T10:34:29.825-04:002009-07-24T10:34:29.825-04:00Rhology,
Next time, I'll abbreviate the "...Rhology,<br /><br />Next time, I'll abbreviate the "bad word."Peter Pikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11792036365040378473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-32568095466253860172009-07-24T10:28:18.464-04:002009-07-24T10:28:18.464-04:00Thanks alot, Peter; I had to lower the sensitivity...Thanks alot, Peter; I had to lower the sensitivity of my browser's profanity filter to view Triablogue today.Rhologyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14245825667079220242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-73314133234623749092009-07-24T10:20:25.735-04:002009-07-24T10:20:25.735-04:00It takes a special kind of geek to work the names ...It takes a special kind of geek to work the names of all five space shuttle orbiters into one conflegrated -- I mean <i>conflated</i> -- response. <br /><br />;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-58980823133926298452009-07-24T10:08:52.651-04:002009-07-24T10:08:52.651-04:00BSman said:
---
So I'll take this as a concess...BSman said:<br />---<br />So I'll take this as a concession then.<br />---<br /><br />I cannot apprehend the manner in which my missive commits one to such a dismissive parry as to envisage such declaration to be even subordinately an act of concession. Such dubiety merits disparagement vis-à-vis yonder author's spacious, voluminous acumen; the very enterprise I endeavor to eschew discovery amidst my counter to said challenger, lest like folkloric Atlantis my renown flounder as conflagrated coffee in Columbia.<br /><br />BSman said:<br />---<br />The necessity of that comma could be debated, just so you know.<br />---<br /><br />Verily, the utmost perspicuous proposition is oft contended by obtuse simpletons, but in no manner does that beget validity to solicit animadversion upon my linguistic sagacity.Peter Pikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11792036365040378473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-25624132896549381132009-07-24T07:32:47.364-04:002009-07-24T07:32:47.364-04:00The traditional rule was that if you could put ...The traditional rule was that if you could put 'and' between the adjectives they should have a comma:<br /><br />The gratuitous, pedantic comment is in the process of being typed.<br /><br />But:<br /><br />My unhealthy skin pallor is the result of infrequent outdoor activity.<br /><br />Nowadays, the trend is towards 'open punctuation' i.e. no rules and minimal punctuation.<br /><br />So as a matter of pedantry Pike is wrong; he is also correct.Claudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16705428441316701050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-26397472560027219672009-07-24T02:53:55.299-04:002009-07-24T02:53:55.299-04:00So I'll take this as a concession then.
The n...So I'll take this as a concession then.<br /><br />The necessity of that comma could be debated, just so you know. Oop! There's another one!bossmanhamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14787721955360743058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-82179715796595329192009-07-24T01:18:20.296-04:002009-07-24T01:18:20.296-04:00Hi Peter,
Thank you for your irenic observations....Hi Peter,<br /><br />Thank you for your irenic observations.<br /><br />;-)Truth Unites... and Divideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08891402278361538353noreply@blogger.com