tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post8431285853909250832..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Do miracles really violate the laws of science?Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-88716082744245639382015-07-15T12:50:00.499-04:002015-07-15T12:50:00.499-04:00Science is certainly reasonable if somewhat limite...Science is certainly reasonable if somewhat limited epistemologically. Revelation is more certain, but that's limited in other ways. Naturalism is anti-science for the observations in this article for it assumes a priori that the physical universe is self-supporting and denies the possibility of the sustaining influence of a Creator. So the error most people make is that science has developed out understanding sufficiently enough to deny certain truths given by revelation.Jim Pembertonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01446388434272680014noreply@blogger.com