tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post6842712075962359983..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Is inerrancy an impediment?Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-11101168327786881982016-08-19T18:31:14.254-04:002016-08-19T18:31:14.254-04:00Thanks Steve!
I just ordered the one edited by Car...Thanks Steve!<br />I just ordered the one edited by Carson a few weeks ago, but have not read any of yet. <br /><br />The other ones are new to me and helpful to know. Though I have seen the Blomberg one mentioned around.<br />I have one of Kitchen's older books, "Ancient Orient and Old Testament".<br /><br />your article and the one about Licona and Mark being confused was excellent.Kenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17824685809003307918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-60997730749967536702016-08-19T11:18:08.533-04:002016-08-19T11:18:08.533-04:00Gregory Beale, The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangel...Gregory Beale, The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism (Crossway 2008)<br /><br />Craig Blomberg, The Historical Reliability of the Gospels (IVP; 2nd ed., 2007)<br /><br />Steven Cowan and Terry Wilder, In Defense of the Bible: A Comprehensive Apologetic for the Authority of Scripture (B&H 2013)<br /><br />James Hoffmeier & Dennis MaGary, eds., Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith? (Crossway 2012)<br /><br />Kenneth Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Eerdmans 2003)<br /><br />John Oswalt, The Bible Among the Myths (Zondervan 2009)<br /><br />Robert Stein, Interpreting Puzzling Texts in the New Testament (Baker 1997)<br /><br />D. A. Carson, ed. The Enduring Authority of the Christian Scriptures (Eerdmans, 2016)stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-3419901278794767692016-08-19T11:13:25.454-04:002016-08-19T11:13:25.454-04:00This is both good and free:
http://frame-poythres...This is both good and free:<br /><br />http://frame-poythress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/PoythressVernInerrancyAndTheGospels.pdfstevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-88963449223106460132016-08-19T10:06:15.174-04:002016-08-19T10:06:15.174-04:00In seminary (1983-88), the book edited by Norman G...In seminary (1983-88), the book edited by Norman Geisler, Inerrancy, was very good and useful to me, and I still take it out and use it. Each chapter is by a different scholar/ apologist. <br /><br />That was the classic book defense for years. (it seems to me) <br /><br /> Do you (anyone seeing this) think there is another newer book that defends Inerrancy better, or improves upon the one edited by Geisler?<br /><br />Kenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17824685809003307918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-41110827105656811482016-08-17T03:52:51.528-04:002016-08-17T03:52:51.528-04:00By contrast, it's the much maligned inerrantis...<i>By contrast, it's the much maligned inerrantists who dig deeper. Who uncover layers of meaning. They don't give up so easy, because they think there's more to find. Inexhaustible meaning. Ironically, it's liberal scholarship that puts the Bible in a little box. For them, the Bible is all to human. </i><br /><br />Amen!!!<br /><br /><b>One's doxic predisposition either opens or closes one up to further understanding. A great modern example is how evolutionary presuppositions blinded evolutionists from the possibility that noncoding DNA had function. It was believers in Intelligent Design who PREDICTED that such DNA would eventually be proven to not be junk.</b><br /><br />It takes faith to see the depth and profundity of Scripture, and that faith is ultimately only had by regeneration. As the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credo_ut_intelligam" rel="nofollow">old Christian saying</a> goes, we believe in order to understand. <br /><br />"It is the glory of God to conceal things, but the glory of kings is to search things out." - Prov. 25:2<br /><br />John Piper is so right when he says that raking is easy but you only get leaves, digging is hard but you may find diamonds.<br /><br />I'm convinced God inspired Scripture so that it's beauty and wisdom is veiled from the unregenerate, but revealed only through regeneration.<br /><br />10 Then the disciples came and said to him, "Why do you speak to them in parables?"11 And he answered them, "To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given.12 For to the one who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.13 This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.14 Indeed, in their case the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled that says:<br /> "'You will indeed hear but never understand,<br /> and you will indeed see but never perceive.<br />15 For this people's heart has grown dull,<br /> and with their ears they can barely hear,<br /> and their eyes they have closed,<br /> lest they should see with their eyes<br /> and hear with their ears<br /> and understand with their heart<br /> and turn, and I would heal them.'<br />16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears, for they hear.17 For truly, I say to you, many prophets and righteous people longed to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.- Matt. 13:10-17<br /><br />14 The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.- 1 Cor. 2:14<br /> <br />ANNOYED PINOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00714774340084597206noreply@blogger.com