tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post6314299609357963168..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Inerrancy and the enlightenmentRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-61193547736974686382013-11-27T07:38:07.274-05:002013-11-27T07:38:07.274-05:00I remember in seminary (Columbia International Uni...I remember in seminary (Columbia International University, Columbia, S.C. - 1983-1988), we had to read ( in 1987) an excellent chapter (chapter 7) on this issue by John Woodbridge in the book, Hermeneutics, Authority, and Canon; edited by D. A. Carson and John Woodbridge. (Zondervan Academic, 1986) Kenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17824685809003307918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-44611603964043994812013-11-27T01:54:56.132-05:002013-11-27T01:54:56.132-05:00I listened to a lecture by Alister McGrath a few m...I listened to a lecture by Alister McGrath a few months ago in which he claimed that inerrancy is an American invention from the 19th century. Where do they come up with this stuff?Ex N1hilohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05386655937760778985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-19307513157816773622013-11-26T13:19:06.153-05:002013-11-26T13:19:06.153-05:00BTW, on a related note, this book serves as a hist...BTW, on a related note, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Biblical-Authority-Critique-Rogers-Proposal/dp/0310447518" rel="nofollow">this book</a> serves as a historical corrective (among other things) to the idea that the Bible is only inerrant in matters pertaining to faith and practice but not history or science.Patrick Chanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16095377877712197984noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-41259296618558068082013-11-26T13:03:49.922-05:002013-11-26T13:03:49.922-05:00Perhaps this is a careless confusion of the refine...Perhaps this is a careless confusion of the refinement of inerrancy with the arrival of belief in inerrancy (which mirrors the error some make by saying the Trinity was a novel concept, imposed by Nicea, etc.); or maybe it has reference to viewing the Scripture as a source of knowledge instead of a source of religious experience.<br /><br />As you've noted, history shows that inerrancy was believed before the Enlightenment.<br /><br />As for hostile sources, I've seen reference to Mark Massa's <i>Charles Augustus Briggs and the Crisis of Historical Criticism</i>, but I've never bothered to track it down.Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12784922935749497931noreply@blogger.com