tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post6174704195789263244..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: More From Giulio Fanti On Dating The Shroud Of TurinRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-25097290773929337542014-03-31T11:02:28.234-04:002014-03-31T11:02:28.234-04:00The 88 c14 dating tests just dont stand up to the ...The 88 c14 dating tests just dont stand up to the preponderence of evidence that favors authenticty. The hungarian pray codex of 1192 alone is older then the oldest date (1260) of the 88 c14 tests. <br /><br />The folding patterns found on John Jackson's light raking tests that match the unique folding pattern (Tetradiplon) describing the mandylion is not used anywhere else but to describe the mandylion shows us that the mandylion and shroud of turin are the same relic. And the written history of the mandylion goes back to the early 500's ad and is based on an earlier 4th century story of King agbar who ruled edessa during Jesus's time.<br /><br />Like you said there is a wealth of evidence for the shroud's authenticity, but id be very interested in seeing if Fanti can confirm the chain of evidence for the fibers he tested. Fanti said he can and will show this when his work is approved through the peer reviewed process, but like you said we didnt even need fanti's tests to know that the 88 c14 tests were invalidated alreadybob smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10037588881657801038noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-10802632276662483892014-02-26T19:28:07.695-05:002014-02-26T19:28:07.695-05:00Wow, four of five dating methods are consistent wi...Wow, four of five dating methods are consistent with the 1st century!!!ANNOYED PINOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00714774340084597206noreply@blogger.com