tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post5124898524338328825..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: "Ten Problems with Presuppositionalism"Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-41458785040404660492016-08-18T19:40:08.119-04:002016-08-18T19:40:08.119-04:00Quickly browsing Partain's article, it may be ...Quickly browsing Partain's article, it may be Partain himself who thinks Scripture is sufficient in such a way that excludes the need and/or usefulness of philosophically sophisticated argumentation. I'll just have to read his article to find out.ANNOYED PINOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00714774340084597206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-39155186864846020262016-08-18T19:34:11.204-04:002016-08-18T19:34:11.204-04:00Nevermind, I think it's clear you meant the la...Nevermind, I think it's clear you meant the latter.ANNOYED PINOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00714774340084597206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-21413509299127335962016-08-18T19:15:02.944-04:002016-08-18T19:15:02.944-04:007. It's bizarre for Partain to suggest that Sc...<i>7. It's bizarre for Partain to suggest that Scripture is sufficient for apologetics...</i><br /><br />Steve, is this is a typo that should say "INsufficient". Or, are you saying Partain mischaracterizes [Vantillian] presuppositional apologetics by assuming it limits itself to Scriptural arguments? I put in "Vantillian/Van Tillian" because Partain may not have Clarkian apologetics in mind here.ANNOYED PINOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00714774340084597206noreply@blogger.com