tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post2676471800866702459..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Shooting Fischers in a barrel Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-51537991077955014032014-05-31T00:27:17.607-04:002014-05-31T00:27:17.607-04:00Steinway 05/30/2014 5:12pm
It's not that some...Steinway 05/30/2014 5:12pm<br /><br />It's not that some folk "think" that Steve Hays is a hypocrite. He *is* one. He posts this link at his website..... <br /><br />http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2014/05/how-not-to-fight-calvinists.html <br /><br />Fred Sanders helpfully admonishes, "...you’ve got to leave the “God of Calvinism” trope in the toolbox..." <br /><br /> And yet, Hays roils at Olson with "the God of Arminianism" refrain multiple times. For instance, http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2014/05/disfellowshipping-calvinists-as.html<br /><br /> Hays should be concerned about his own "subversive standards". "But he isn't. That's because the [Arminian] opponent is more real to [Hays] than the God of Scripture."<br /><br />http://www.credendum.net/blog/steve-hays-vs-dr-roger-olson-on-the-worthiness-of-god<br /><br />i) The fact that I reference an Arminian (Sanders) advising fellow Arminians hardly binds me to his usage. I'm drawing attention to an intramural Arminian exchange. <br /><br />ii) I employ "God of Calvinism" and "God of Arminianism" as designations to distinguish between Reformed theism and Arminian theism respectively. That's for ease of reference. It's not polemical. <br /><br />iii) Since the God of Scripture nowhere forbids using these designations to distinguish Reformed theism from Arminian theism, "Steinway's" attempted parallel is patently fallacious. stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.com