Tuesday, March 06, 2012

Round up on dispensationalism


In this post I’ve collated my impromptu debate over dispensationalism–along with some supplementary material. I don’t normally debate dispensationalism. It’s not one of my theological priorities. If I woke up tomorrow believing what Darrel Bock or S. Lewis Johnson believe, that wouldn’t require a major adjustment in my theology.

The only reason I ending up discussing this recently is because Paul Henebury commented on a post of mine. So that generated some back-and-forth.

As a Protestant, I’m comfortable with a certain amount of theological diversity. In eschatology, the only position I consider to be out-of-bounds is preterism. 


http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/typetoken.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/new-exodus.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/futures-not-what-it-used-to-be.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/meaning-of-meaning.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/salva-veritate.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/types-shadows.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/back-to-future.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-did-first-hearers-hear.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/signs-of-times.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/hermeneutic-of-suspicion.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/02/dispensationalist-on-dispensationalism.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/rocinante-to-rescue.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-does-face-value-meaning-mean.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/dispensational-equivocations-and.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/dispensational-hermeneutics.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/perspectives-on-ezekiel.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/double-trouble.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/temple-trebled.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/apotelesmatic-interpretation.html

http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2012/03/varieties-of-dispensationalism.html

5 comments:

  1. Which kind of preterism do you believe to be out of bounds, Steve? Partial or full? Or is it both?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very useful compilation, thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gary Demar is scowling his angry eyes at you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whew I'm safe from Steve's ire as I am only a partial.

    ReplyDelete