I should state at the outset that this post is directed at Ed Babinski, and not his equine namesake. I don’t wish anyone to confuse Babinski...

In interest of full disclosure, I should say that I have had some private email conversations with Hays where I have disagreed with some of ...

Continuing with Singer and Hauser... "What was good for our ancestors may not be good today." ( ibid ) So, they're simply rela...

Steve already commented on the Singer and Hauser case for an ethic for secularism. I'll lift one statement out of their paper and offe...

Steve's been blogging on bioethicist Peter Singer lately. Of course Singer's well known for holding such positions that it may be mo...

Out of morbid curiosity, I spent a few minutes examining Caroline Kennedy’s much touted qualifications to be a US senator. Here’s her distin...

Peter Singer and Marc Hauser have written a little brief in defense of secular ethics: http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/200601--.htm ...

"There is, anyway, little historical evidence to suggest that a permissive attitude towards the killing of one category of human beings...

Here’s an example of how Peter Singer—an influential, secular bioethicist—approaches life and death issues: In dealing with an objection t...

Here's some quotes from P e TA’s FAQ: “What do you mean by ‘animal rights’?” People who support animal rights believe that animals are n...

Refutation of New Scientist’s Evolution: 24 myths and misconceptions by Jonathan Sarfati HT: Fred Butler

When the enemies of Calvinism can’t successfully attack Calvinism on principled grounds, they resort to ad hominem. The stock example is Cal...