tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post8889572804780249405..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Apologetic methodology revisitedRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-70534248854667548042016-09-26T17:07:37.601-04:002016-09-26T17:07:37.601-04:00Good points. I would add, for the uninformed, tha...Good points. I would add, for the uninformed, that the presuppositional argument for the existence of God is that an absolute God - one who is the source of all facts and their meanings - is necessary for the possibility of rationality. This type of God could never be mistaken about any facts. So the type of God proven by TAG necessarily entails a doctrine of inerrancy. And since an absolute God who speaks infallibly is necessary for the possibility of rationality, this type of God must be presupposed in any investigation of particular historical facts.Mike W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/07856737297410536189noreply@blogger.com