tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post8643369428312518216..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Were the Wright brothers a hoax?Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-41472197148675173452016-12-07T09:04:43.196-05:002016-12-07T09:04:43.196-05:00It also impinges on a naturalistic testability aft...It also impinges on a naturalistic testability after the fact. That is, what evidence do we have that it was different before it changed? In the case of water to wine, what evidence do we have of the water that was changed? In the case of resurrection, what evidence do we have that Jesus was killed and then came back to life that we can now test? If we limit ourselves to naturalistic means, we limit ourselves to other means of empirical evidence. We also presume that evidence itself is sufficient, or at least the only epistemologically valid source of objective truth.Jim Pembertonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01446388434272680014noreply@blogger.com