tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post7984192139538480396..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Ehrman's Errors In His Debate With BauckhamRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-64061016878994775482016-04-12T23:45:04.826-04:002016-04-12T23:45:04.826-04:00Excellent post, Jason! I listened to the debate, a...Excellent post, Jason! I listened to the debate, and was bit disappointed in Bauckham.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-31922647278235707022016-04-12T19:13:43.055-04:002016-04-12T19:13:43.055-04:00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWdm9YXJgK0
Has a...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWdm9YXJgK0<br /><br />Has anyone taken on this review that tries to refute Bauckham's chapter on names in Jesus and the Eyewitnesses? ReformedScholarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16911344555210476836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-67391409611114686082016-04-11T18:33:54.367-04:002016-04-11T18:33:54.367-04:00geoffrobinson,
No, the names issue didn't com...geoffrobinson,<br /><br />No, the names issue didn't come up in the first program.Jason Engwerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17031011335190895123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-75239912337225712222016-04-11T17:38:05.047-04:002016-04-11T17:38:05.047-04:00As far as I know, he rejects it.As far as I know, he rejects it.Jason Engwerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17031011335190895123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-57514172308404065572016-04-11T14:47:48.559-04:002016-04-11T14:47:48.559-04:00He wrote the book "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses...He wrote the book "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses".<br /><br />Peter Williams does a nice summation (along with other information) here:<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5Ylt1pBMm8geoffrobinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14949411893531888555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-16687003106707594412016-04-11T09:52:32.042-04:002016-04-11T09:52:32.042-04:00Any sources please?Any sources please?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-69296353505075627542016-04-11T08:57:05.731-04:002016-04-11T08:57:05.731-04:00I'm going to listen when I have time, but I wo...I'm going to listen when I have time, but I would definitely like an analysis of Bauckham's positive case.geoffrobinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14949411893531888555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-61067808027193067502016-04-11T08:55:19.085-04:002016-04-11T08:55:19.085-04:00Did Bauckham bring up his work on the frequency of...Did Bauckham bring up his work on the frequency of names and their rates relative to archeology? His work on that, regardless of any disagreements we may have with him, is in my belief the single greatest apologetic advance in the last 25 years. Absolutely devastating to so many liberal theories.geoffrobinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14949411893531888555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-48189404190516357722016-04-11T08:05:20.660-04:002016-04-11T08:05:20.660-04:00What's Bauckham's view on inerrancy?What's Bauckham's view on inerrancy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com