tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post765897747900615577..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: Richard Carrier: Christian apologistRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-30483313180819720182019-11-29T14:11:14.600-05:002019-11-29T14:11:14.600-05:00Steve: look carrier says things that make it clear...Steve: look carrier says things that make it clear he is accepting an argument from prophecy unwittingly. <br /><br />Moron: buhbuh but.... Daniel is a forgerie that was written a century before Jesus therefore”<br /><br /><br />.... no one knows it just sounds like it’s relevant. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-31554321560828073252018-03-23T22:15:18.964-04:002018-03-23T22:15:18.964-04:00Good point SteveGood point SteveAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-75641015593496883972018-03-23T09:19:56.487-04:002018-03-23T09:19:56.487-04:00That's irrelevant to his argument. His argumen...That's irrelevant to his argument. His argument is that Daniel is prior to the 1C, so it still reflects messianic expectation of pre-Christian Jews. Whether or not it's a forgery is beside the point in that regard. stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-29415729678672882692018-03-23T03:50:27.828-04:002018-03-23T03:50:27.828-04:00Rather disingenuous as you make no mention that Ca...Rather disingenuous as you make no mention that Carrier would argue Daniel is a forgery. Stephen Galanishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14509266923792169486noreply@blogger.com