tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post7386571013914581469..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: One man's piety is another man's impietyRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-40114137420679312782011-12-01T15:28:20.401-05:002011-12-01T15:28:20.401-05:00It's always fun reminiscing with you Dave, tho...It's always fun reminiscing with you Dave, though I haven't much had the pleasure.<br /><br />Keep keepin' it real.Mr. Fosihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17652392944938128012noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-74661232229495151012011-12-01T14:11:36.121-05:002011-12-01T14:11:36.121-05:00Pitifully poor TAO.Pitifully poor TAO.Dave Armstronghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07771661758539438173noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-11335795297529342472011-12-01T14:02:21.331-05:002011-12-01T14:02:21.331-05:00Poor Dave.Poor Dave.Turretinfanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802277110253897379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-9436272527453982052011-12-01T13:15:43.046-05:002011-12-01T13:15:43.046-05:00. . . and Fosi denied twice that Bugay drew a Hitl.... . . and Fosi denied twice that Bugay drew a Hitler mustache, even after Bugay stated that he did, and was merely talking tongue-in-cheek about not having done so (and has now removed it). That was fun; thanks!<br /><br /><i>Notice that dear ol' Dave hasn't disproven any of the points I make in my post.</i><br /><br />LOL There is nothing there to disprove in the first place, since it is a running non sequitur in relation to the argument I actually made. But that is par for the course around here.Dave Armstronghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07771661758539438173noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-90220859739172655972011-12-01T09:00:39.528-05:002011-12-01T09:00:39.528-05:00And Dave with his malformed parenthetical statemen...And Dave with his malformed parenthetical statements.<br /><br />"Steve's mom dresses him funny!"Mr. Fosihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17652392944938128012noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-4816985671055302342011-12-01T07:37:16.013-05:002011-12-01T07:37:16.013-05:00Notice that dear ol' Dave hasn't disproven...Notice that dear ol' Dave hasn't disproven any of the points I make in my post.stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-90589571815153331512011-11-30T23:21:50.934-05:002011-11-30T23:21:50.934-05:00And you can have your incessant incomplete sentenc...And you can have your incessant incomplete sentences, your vulgar sex site, and your bizarre view that one shouldn't pray for certain people they deem to be (contra Calvin) beyond all hope).Dave Armstronghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07771661758539438173noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-25232771975374495172011-11-30T22:37:13.244-05:002011-11-30T22:37:13.244-05:00And a remarkably elastic interpretation of "b...And a remarkably elastic interpretation of "blasphemy".<br /><br />Did Dave throw Paul Hoffer under the bus here or what?<br /><br />Dave said,<br /><br /> The term is also used, in a weaker sense, of slanderous language addressed to men (e.g. Mk. 3:28; 7:22; Eph. 4:31; Col. 3:8; Tit. 3:2). Here the best translation is 'slander, abuse'.<br /><br />Funny that Dave might think that Mk. 3:28 is a "weak sense"-<br /> "I tell you the truth, people will be forgiven for all sins, even all the blasphemies they utter" (NET)<br /><br />Almost makes John's comments seem rather innocuous, doesn't it?<br /><br />Yet us Prot's are far more concerned with the subsequent verse of Mark. A stronger sense. A verse not mentioned by Dave- <br /> "But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven, but is guilty of an eternal sin" (NET)<br /><br />Hardly as innocuous, huh?<br /><br />Seems far better to base an interpretation on this stronger sense. <br />A sense that Dave strangely neglected. <br /><br />But let Dave have his dill and cummin...Ron Van Brenkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15623171051016737306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-21335525252730736202011-11-30T21:08:20.752-05:002011-11-30T21:08:20.752-05:00Yes, he has a remarkably elastic interpretation of...Yes, he has a remarkably elastic interpretation of his vow.stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-75572535962322537252011-11-30T20:56:55.459-05:002011-11-30T20:56:55.459-05:00For someone who doesn't debate you, Steve, Dav...For someone who doesn't debate you, Steve, Dave sure posts a lot of words.Turretinfanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802277110253897379noreply@blogger.com