tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post6213254664240258507..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: A Review Of Michael Licona's The Resurrection Of Jesus (Part 4)Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-66198823483185787842010-11-15T17:38:43.618-05:002010-11-15T17:38:43.618-05:00halo,
Andrew of Caesarea tells us that Papias tes...halo,<br /><br />Andrew of Caesarea tells us that Papias testified to the genuineness of Revelation along with Irenaeus and some other sources. The implication is that Papias affirmed the apostle John's authorship of the document, as Irenaeus and others did.Jason Engwerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17031011335190895123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-68360007965515780342010-11-15T11:03:19.069-05:002010-11-15T11:03:19.069-05:00Very interesting post. It would be good to hear a ...Very interesting post. It would be good to hear a response from Licona on this of why he omitted this evidence in light of what you have said.<br /><br />Concerning your last 4-5 sentences, I wonder if Papias' implied familiarity with the book of Revelation is a big reason why some scholars who follow Dionysius argue that the authorship of Revelation is the other John the elder, not John the Apostle.Henryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06242793531954844979noreply@blogger.com