tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post4795595362362640212..comments2024-03-27T17:15:37.606-04:00Comments on Triablogue: He was for it before he was agin itRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17809283662428917799noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-78146529677888104672009-11-11T14:52:24.258-05:002009-11-11T14:52:24.258-05:00Victor,
I notice your use of the past tense. Does...Victor,<br /><br />I notice your use of the past tense. Does this mean you're wavering? But you gave that as a reason to vote for Obama. So are you now withdrawing that reason? Is that one less reason to vote for Obama?stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-50402993794786264392009-11-11T14:45:04.325-05:002009-11-11T14:45:04.325-05:00I thought it would be a good idea to double down o...I thought it would be a good idea to double down on bin Laden and get him. He did attack us, Saddam did not. I'm willing to consider arguments on all sides of this issue, however. No one seems to have picked up the debate, at the moment.Victor Repperthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-69160284095934431772009-11-10T18:08:19.077-05:002009-11-10T18:08:19.077-05:00Does this mean you support the troop surge in Afgh...Does this mean you support the troop surge in Afghanistan? After all, that's what Obama campaigned on, and you gave that as a reason to vote for him. Which is it, Victor?stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-12279836867579126442009-11-10T16:59:56.213-05:002009-11-10T16:59:56.213-05:00So even though you plugged that anti-war article, ...So even though you plugged that anti-war article, you actually oppose it. Is that it?stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-58494304953147177432009-11-10T16:44:55.945-05:002009-11-10T16:44:55.945-05:00Oops. That is not an endorsement for the article. ...Oops. That is not an endorsement for the article. That was presenting something for possible discussion. Eisegesis again. This is getting to be a pattern.Victor Repperthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-66606432792949042062009-11-10T16:25:45.493-05:002009-11-10T16:25:45.493-05:00I've bought Kostenberger's new book on Joh...I've bought Kostenberger's new book on Johannine theology, but haven't had time to do much with it.stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6789188.post-60115849222859676002009-11-10T16:20:12.218-05:002009-11-10T16:20:12.218-05:00Steve,
This is off-topic (again), but have you se...Steve,<br /><br />This is off-topic (again), but have you seen any reviews of James McGrath's book on John's theology?<br /><br />Also, he reviewed Andreas Kostenberger's book on the Trinity in the IVP Biblical theology series:<br />http://www.amazon.com/Father-Son-Spirit-Biblical-Theology/dp/0830826254/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257887784&sr=8-8<br /><br />Lastly, have you had the time to take a look at Kostenberger's work on Johannine theology (published by Zondervan)?Saint and Sinnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14166699860672840738noreply@blogger.com